And what does that have to do with this third party exclusive?

This is a story based game, I really feel someone can give a valid opinion only if they have at the very least completed or attempted to complete a playthrough. I mean previews fine, but right out saying don't buy means you think the game is consistently awful.

Anywho, most other impressions have been decent to good so i'll check it out.

I think he means because it is a first party ip, sony owns the ip.

Still a weird thing to say because (assuming he's on about order as a third-party developed first-party ip) we also got the brilliant bloodborne in the same boat. Not trusting ip's as a general seems to be a weird solution because there really is no correlation to quality and sony's new first party ip's.

Haven't really paid attention to anything about this game but his review seems very harsh.

He played 3 hours of a 9 hour game with 8 characters and mulitiple playthroughs, then he criticized the game for accomplishing exactly what it was designed to do: mirror slasher films from the 80s - 90s. What he's dong here is helping 'retards' as he calls them in the comments section. Such a trustworthy source. What pleases some people I guess ...

I've watched 2 of his videos before and he is such a pretentious and arrogant person. I'd never take his opinion as relevant.

Anyway, if this game is like Beyond two souls then it ain't for me...I will probably buy it when it hits $20 tho.

I'm not sure it's for me either but we should at least wait for a review from someone who's finished more that 1 third of the game and understands what tongue in cheek means.

I'm more surprised that the game has more gameplay mechanics that what I've seen so far. I rather wait for the embargo though.

I'm still intrigued by the game at least. It's like Heavy Rain in not pretentious. It should at the very least make for a fun watch on youtube if not more.

I preordered it. I'll have it on Tuesday.