By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Canadian Federal Election 2015 - Next Debate: September 17, 2015

Tagged games:

ReimTime on 06 August 2015

And now for some anti-Harper propaganda:



#1 Amb-ass-ador

Around the Network
MoHasanie on 06 August 2015

I really don't want Harper to win. The economy isn't growing and we need someone better than him.



    

NNID: FrequentFlyer54

novasonic on 06 August 2015

This election has me really concerned. The NDP has tricked too many people into thinking they're the best option. This happened in BC during the early '70s and early '90s. There seems to be this cycle where every 20 years or so, people collectively think, "Hey, maybe the NDP is good now," and then they quickly realize they're mistake.

We must learn from history!!




8th gen predictions. (made early 2014)
PS4: 60-65m
WiiU: 30-35m
X1: 30-35m
3DS: 80-85m
PSV: 15-20m

Ruler on 06 August 2015

All 3 are probably US puppets



Why i left PC gaming

 

(2015) Question for PS4 owners: if the situation would be reverse? would you still play on PS4?

(2015) The "I don't care PS4 is the most powerful console" thread

Ruler on 06 August 2015
ReimTime said:

Right so I'll try to be a little more intelligent.

Harper: Only way I could vote for this man is if Putin and Castro led the other parties. If I could summarize my dislike for Harper and put it into a paper I would call it Bill C-45; because of how he and the Tories buried questionable legislation within it, such as removing the protection and/or Federal oversight from 99.9% of our rivers (and 99.7% of our lakes). If nobody remembers this bill, it was the cause of the whole "Idle No More" movement. Another example would be the replacement of Canada's Environmental Assessment Act within Bill C-38 (the "Jobs, Growth, and Long-Term Prosperity Act"). Canada's laws on such matters are terrible enough as it is (did you know that Nestle gets charged $2.25 for every one million litres of water they extract from the ground in BC? You know, the water they profit off of?), so we don't need a PM who seems to think that selling off our land and natural resources is a good idea. I dislike how he treats Canadian Scientists, I dislike the controversy that surrounds him (robocalls, senate spending, corporate tax cuts etc), I dislike his disdain for our environment and natural beauty, and I especially dislike how he spends so much time and money on childish attack ads against the opposition. He's slimy and he's been in power for much too long already. I want him out.

Mulcair: Many would think that he is the next leader (coming off Layton's success and the Alberta elected NDP gov't) but I am not so sure. I'm looking forward to seeing what he's all about in the election debates that will be coming up. So far, I'm not too impressed. Perhaps it's because Layton was such a different personality whom I quite liked as a politician, but the way Mulcair seems to point fingers at Harper more than pushing his own platform kind of grinds my gears. However I like the NDP stance on Environmental matters and economic policy, so the NDP party very well may get my vote.

Trudeau: I think he is too young to be PM. No, I was not swayed by Harper's propaganda. I believe that Trudeau is more of a people's rockstar than a responsible politician; famous because of his name and not because of his policies. He will fight over the young-person's vote with the NDP and he may get it but a future with him running the country will probably be a little uncertain. I stand right in the middle of the political spectrum in my beliefs, so you might call me a Liberal; but I am not sure how well Trudeau would represent those beliefs. I am stuck between voting for him and Mulcair.

So who does my vote go to? Brad Wall, the premier of my home province and the best politicial representative that I have seen in this day and age. I could talk about him but they may be going off topic a little. #WallForPM lol.

So how are putin and castro bad as leader? They are bad for the US and Nato but not for their own countries



Why i left PC gaming

 

(2015) Question for PS4 owners: if the situation would be reverse? would you still play on PS4?

(2015) The "I don't care PS4 is the most powerful console" thread

Around the Network
ReimTime on 06 August 2015
Ruler said:
ReimTime said:

Right so I'll try to be a little more intelligent.

Harper: Only way I could vote for this man is if Putin and Castro led the other parties. If I could summarize my dislike for Harper and put it into a paper I would call it Bill C-45; because of how he and the Tories buried questionable legislation within it, such as removing the protection and/or Federal oversight from 99.9% of our rivers (and 99.7% of our lakes). If nobody remembers this bill, it was the cause of the whole "Idle No More" movement. Another example would be the replacement of Canada's Environmental Assessment Act within Bill C-38 (the "Jobs, Growth, and Long-Term Prosperity Act"). Canada's laws on such matters are terrible enough as it is (did you know that Nestle gets charged $2.25 for every one million litres of water they extract from the ground in BC? You know, the water they profit off of?), so we don't need a PM who seems to think that selling off our land and natural resources is a good idea. I dislike how he treats Canadian Scientists, I dislike the controversy that surrounds him (robocalls, senate spending, corporate tax cuts etc), I dislike his disdain for our environment and natural beauty, and I especially dislike how he spends so much time and money on childish attack ads against the opposition. He's slimy and he's been in power for much too long already. I want him out.

Mulcair: Many would think that he is the next leader (coming off Layton's success and the Alberta elected NDP gov't) but I am not so sure. I'm looking forward to seeing what he's all about in the election debates that will be coming up. So far, I'm not too impressed. Perhaps it's because Layton was such a different personality whom I quite liked as a politician, but the way Mulcair seems to point fingers at Harper more than pushing his own platform kind of grinds my gears. However I like the NDP stance on Environmental matters and economic policy, so the NDP party very well may get my vote.

Trudeau: I think he is too young to be PM. No, I was not swayed by Harper's propaganda. I believe that Trudeau is more of a people's rockstar than a responsible politician; famous because of his name and not because of his policies. He will fight over the young-person's vote with the NDP and he may get it but a future with him running the country will probably be a little uncertain. I stand right in the middle of the political spectrum in my beliefs, so you might call me a Liberal; but I am not sure how well Trudeau would represent those beliefs. I am stuck between voting for him and Mulcair.

So who does my vote go to? Brad Wall, the premier of my home province and the best politicial representative that I have seen in this day and age. I could talk about him but they may be going off topic a little. #WallForPM lol.

So how are putin and castro bad as leader? They are bad for the US and Nato but not for

Castro: Socialism or death = suppression of personal and political freedoms

Putin: Supresses free speech and social/public media

Might I ask why you would ask that question?



#1 Amb-ass-ador

Ruler on 06 August 2015
ReimTime said:
Ruler said:
ReimTime said:

Right so I'll try to be a little more intelligent.

Harper: Only way I could vote for this man is if Putin and Castro led the other parties. If I could summarize my dislike for Harper and put it into a paper I would call it Bill C-45; because of how he and the Tories buried questionable legislation within it, such as removing the protection and/or Federal oversight from 99.9% of our rivers (and 99.7% of our lakes). If nobody remembers this bill, it was the cause of the whole "Idle No More" movement. Another example would be the replacement of Canada's Environmental Assessment Act within Bill C-38 (the "Jobs, Growth, and Long-Term Prosperity Act"). Canada's laws on such matters are terrible enough as it is (did you know that Nestle gets charged $2.25 for every one million litres of water they extract from the ground in BC? You know, the water they profit off of?), so we don't need a PM who seems to think that selling off our land and natural resources is a good idea. I dislike how he treats Canadian Scientists, I dislike the controversy that surrounds him (robocalls, senate spending, corporate tax cuts etc), I dislike his disdain for our environment and natural beauty, and I especially dislike how he spends so much time and money on childish attack ads against the opposition. He's slimy and he's been in power for much too long already. I want him out.

Mulcair: Many would think that he is the next leader (coming off Layton's success and the Alberta elected NDP gov't) but I am not so sure. I'm looking forward to seeing what he's all about in the election debates that will be coming up. So far, I'm not too impressed. Perhaps it's because Layton was such a different personality whom I quite liked as a politician, but the way Mulcair seems to point fingers at Harper more than pushing his own platform kind of grinds my gears. However I like the NDP stance on Environmental matters and economic policy, so the NDP party very well may get my vote.

Trudeau: I think he is too young to be PM. No, I was not swayed by Harper's propaganda. I believe that Trudeau is more of a people's rockstar than a responsible politician; famous because of his name and not because of his policies. He will fight over the young-person's vote with the NDP and he may get it but a future with him running the country will probably be a little uncertain. I stand right in the middle of the political spectrum in my beliefs, so you might call me a Liberal; but I am not sure how well Trudeau would represent those beliefs. I am stuck between voting for him and Mulcair.

So who does my vote go to? Brad Wall, the premier of my home province and the best politicial representative that I have seen in this day and age. I could talk about him but they may be going off topic a little. #WallForPM lol.

So how are putin and castro bad as leader? They are bad for the US and Nato but not for

Castro: Socialism or death = suppression of personal and political freedoms

Putin: Supresses free speech and social/public media

Might I ask why you would ask that question?

Why shouldnt I ? You make a comment like that which is groundless and basedd on pure Propaganda. 

 

Cuba is richer than all the other latin american countries, Evil socialism did its work i guess

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD/countries/1W-CU-RU-ZJ-B8?display=graph



Why i left PC gaming

 

(2015) Question for PS4 owners: if the situation would be reverse? would you still play on PS4?

(2015) The "I don't care PS4 is the most powerful console" thread

fatslob-:O on 06 August 2015

Since none of the candidates are really better than each other I think there is no reason to change to a new prime minister ...



Conegamer on 06 August 2015

I have no idea what's happening but nice thread Blue! Will be following it and you can bore someone else with your political jargon now :-p

I kid ofcourse.



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

ReimTime on 06 August 2015
Ruler said:
ReimTime said:
Ruler said:

So how are putin and castro bad as leader? They are bad for the US and Nato but not for

Castro: Socialism or death = suppression of personal and political freedoms

Putin: Supresses free speech and social/public media

Might I ask why you would ask that question?

Why shouldnt I ? You make a comment like that which is groundless and basedd on pure Propaganda. 

 

Cuba is richer than all the other latin american countries, Evil socialism did its work i guess

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD/countries/1W-CU-RU-ZJ-B8?display=graph

Wat? There is a reason Stevie Wonder gets somebody to buy his paint, you know. You see to Stevie, all paint is the same because it all feels and smells the same. I think you'd gather better evidence about being a citizen if you moved to late-20th century Cuba yourself and took a whiff.

Castro did some great things! He reduced illiteracy, helped spread electricity, abolished legal discrimination, and pushed forward free healthcare and education. But he also squeezed the citizens political and economic freedoms. No elections, no private businesses, thousands of political opponents jailed, and an authoritarian position over housing and consumer goods shortages. There is a reason hundreds of thousands of Cubans left for the USA when Castro took over.

Cuba, under Castro, was one of the most corrupt states in the world. If you can claim that you'd like to live under Castro and that 40+ years of recorded history from multiple sources is a lie, is groundless, and is pure propaganda; then by all means see what your wall looks like when you're done painting. I for one would never want to live under Castro.

 

 



#1 Amb-ass-ador