You would if you bought it.

Mass Effect 3 on WiiU includes a digital backstory comic, where you can even make decisions that players were able to do in ME and ME2 to customize your ME3 experience.

ME2 on PS3 had the same back when ME wasn't on the platform.

It's not the best way to start, but it's far from impossible. I mean look at the Witcher 3 right now. It's going to easily outsell the previous games, so there must be hundreds of thousands if not millions of players who haven't played the previous games. Story-wise they are far more connected than, let's say The Elder Scrolls.

Look I know my example doesn´t fit the situation 100%. However my point, which I didn´t make clear enough (was kinda drunk), was that as a Wii U only owner these games are actually brand new. The release date on Wii U is the first time the game will be available to the consumer and thus to him/her a brand new experience.

I agree though, that everything should have its limitations. Such as a reaaaaaally late port not being full price (Like REmake) but up to a year after the "original release" seems toleratable to me.

Stuff like Need for Speed sold tens of thousands. Hell even the Vita version sold significantly more and no one is surprised the Vita versions stopped coming. You can cling to the notion that its lazy 3rd party devs if you want. And that releasing a few months earlier with a slightly better frame rate would change the tide. But the reality is pretty obvious for anyone looking at this objectively.

Also your examples of "poor" ps3 sales were Wii ports. That is a whole generational leap in hardware. This is the exact opposite going from current gen tech to last gen tech. If you don't think that requires significantly more time, effort and funding...

I don't think that's true... They're just not likely to buy crappy games from 3rd parties that many others line up in droves to buy. I know if they'd released that assassins creed rogue on the Wii U I'd have purchased it, but the only games we seem to get are Cars or Watchdog... I'm not about to buy crappy 3rd party games just to prove that we will.

If anyone here feels entitled it's the Devs and publishers who know outside of the wii u their crappy games will sell millions by virtue of their name and advertising alone, but the same trick doesn't work with the average Wii U owner.

There's plenty of 3rd party games I'd like to see on the Wii U, but we generally get the trash.

Lost Planet isn't on Wii and the Wii games were enhanced and had added content and sold less which counters the whole point of late ports still selling. Wii U is more powerful then PS3 so you're porting to better hardware.

@bolded to be fair you didnt mention this in this thread and to be honest its hard to keep up with who said what in this regard. Between you and me i am completly for this idea and i think thats what NX will be. But there are some on this very site who are againt it so its hard for me to keep up with who is for or against. Again I hope they actually do this.

That wasn't directed at u, I was just stating that it's something I have been saying a lot lately lol

Alot of fanboys were making claims based on nothing and simply not true at all. Some straight lies too. As we clearly see with sales it does matter. Most people arent going to want to play a version of a game that is THAT inferior. 

No they really havent which again. Alot of Wii version of games were missing features and just straight ran like crap. Thats not on 3rds Ninty made the system they made and it just couldnt handle the games the PS360 could, people noticed rest is history.

Most GC multiplats were the worst selling but at least they sold close to the Xbox versions which make sense since those two systems sold alike

I dont see how a late port equates to microtransactions. What? those arent even close to the same thing. You are really reaching. You are ignoring things like timed exclusives, are maybe the HW just flat sucking and it needed more time to be worked on(which was pretty much the case for PS3 initially)

Why would you pay full price? cause you dont have a choice, its the only way to play that game if you REALLY wanted to play in the first place. Doesnt matter if its bargain on a system you dont have. either get that system. buy it when it comes to your system or not all. Hell you could even wait till your version its the bargain bin. Rayman and GTA dont even have the same kind of audience, lets not pretend Rayman was going to sell well it wasnt. It hasnt since the original which ironically was PS exclusive. YOu know what was dumb making it WIi U exclusive in the first place. I would have bought Smash too, but i would have got Watchdogs eventually if I wanted it, do people not have money can they only get one game at a time right at that time? hell could have bought it the next month. People just need to admit that really werent interested in the game in the first place. Its ok.

becasue those games sold gangbusters originally? no they didnt. IMHO those games were mediocore at best. Truth is PS360 had WAY more options than Wii ever had in regards to those genres. NMHs arrived much later on PS3 and that game wasnt that great to begin with. Why play that when you have accest to Bayo or God of War? you wouldnt. Muramasa didnt come out on PS3 so i dont know where that came from. you mean Vita? dont have to explain that one.

GE was a great game...on WIi. I bought that game it was the best game on Wii in terms of FPS. Now on PS360 its mediocore. You gonna but that up agains the CODs, Bioshocks, Killzones, Halos? lol. Nope doesnt even hold a candle. IMHO it just shows how lacking Wii was in those genres.