sc94597 said:
generic-user-1 said:
sc94597 said:
generic-user-1 said: can somebody explain why the czarism isnt the same as monarchism? the czar was an absolut Monarch with a cool title, nothing more. and it doesnt reflect good on things like imperialism. |
Czarism is a synonym for autocratic government in this case.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsarist_autocracy
Monarchism does not necessarily have to be autocratic so it won't be tied with tsarism (notice that tsarism is where monarchy and fascism overlap.)
|
cant find differences to an absolut monarchie...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolutism_%28European_history%29
|
Because an autocracy and absolute monarchy are the same thing. Not all monarchies are absolutist/autocratic though. I think if the creator of the diagram just change czarism to autocracy it would lessen the confusion.
|
sure, there are feudal monarchies too, and the british have a very strange kind of monarchie.
but if you talk about monarchie you normaly mean absolut monarchies, in other kind of monarchies the king hasnt much to say(or nothing at all like in britain)