If you think it is then send me one video where an entire game has been shown. Its always just clips from certain modes, certain characters, certain levels and so on.
Yes there are videos of speedruns which show a game being completed (still not 100%), but they are not the videos taking in money because as I mentioned already, raw gameplay is worthless. Its the extra content youtubers add to gameplay that makes it worth something.
I already told you cars and games are not designed with the purpose of watching/listening, whereas music and movies are. If you are still unable to figure out how that relates to copyright, I cant help you.
A 3 min clip of a movie compared to more than 1h footage of the game recorded is equivalent to you?
Speedruns normally aren't 100%, just the bare minimun to finish the game... raw gameplay is worthless, and no game included and just the comments about anything not game related?
I understood your point, but you still didn't answered why if someone wants to portray the car they must pay, receive or at least have permission. And copyright pretty much states you aren't allowed to broadcast it without authorization.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"