the_dengle said:
Well I meant verbally. Nonetheless calling someone a fanboy was already against the rules.
I mean, I can see the logic behind this. If someone makes disparaging comments about a game, coming back at them with "Well you're an Xbox fan so of course you don't like it" or something like that is just unnecessary. Make a legitimate critique of their post or don't bother with them.
I've had to deal with comments like this in the past, so I don't mind this rule: "You haven't played the game. You have a Pokemon avatar. I think its safe to say you have no right to be judging this game this harshly. You're being way too critical. Here's a thought: keep your opinions to yourself. Unless you've played the game, your opinions on the game are irrelevant."
|
Agreed. One of my very first posts was to question the credibility of a guy heavily criticizing the Wii U. He ventured to make comments about its battery life and the range of the GamePad as if he had hands-on experience, yet he later admitted that his only time with it was about 15 minutes on a demo unit at Best Buy or something.
If you're going to make bold claims that are not indisputable fact, other people should be allowed to address such claims or question your crediblity on the matter. Too many people make the mistake of thinking that a rebuttal of an opinion means that the other person is trying to silence that opinion, but that simply isn't true. It just means that if you have the right to share your opinion in a public forum and expect others to read it, those others have a right to respond to it and check you when necessary.