By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - So Infamous is a flop: why did Sucker Punch fail?

EB1994 said:
Carl2291 said:
Is this a serious thread or is it a joke thread that fails to be funny?

Look at the disclaimer lol.

I know this is a joke thread....but it is a shame and pathetic how much gamers rely on metacritic scores to prove that said game is a flop or master piece. 

 



Around the Network

Another reason to not take metacritic seriously.



Sales is a better measure of success than critical ratings. Money talks - opinions walks.



If you want a 90+ meta AAA game, you're going to have to wait till early next year when Witcher 3 launches.



Wagram said:
I believe if 2014 has taught us anything thus far it is that expectations need to be grounded. Enough with this HYPE HYPE HYPE HYPE. Also an 81 is a fine score, but people need to stop with this massive hype that most developers can't deliver on.

Really I thought it taught us that only FPS, Sports games, indies and last gen late ports are allowed to score hightly =P



Around the Network
EB1994 said:
ps3-sales! said:
EB1994 said:
ps3-sales! said:

Simple question, difficult answer. With the recent metacritic reviews coming in Infamous Second Son has an average of 81; or a flop by AAA game standards. Where did Sucker Punch go wrong? It's obvious that the 54 critics on metacritic all agreed with one thing: The story sucks. 

It's a shame really. But I guess with Titanfall failing to be a great game with a score of 90+, we should have expected this. The next gen simply isn't very next gen if it can't even produce 90+ games on Metacritic because as we all know; great games must have at least a 90+ score to be great. 

Put simply: Infamous: Second Son is a flop; as is Titanfall. I guess we're still waiting for the first truely "next gen game". 

Discuss why Infamous is a flop in your opinion. 

 

 

 

 

*Disclaimer: I have not played infamous nor Titanfall. I am simply assuming they are bad games based on their subpar 90 meta-scores as most gamers should*

http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/towerfall-ascension

Nu-uh!!! Towerfall Ascension is a 90 metacritic! PS4 GOTY


Towerfall is not a truely next gen game. It was ported from PC and everybody knows PC has no gen.

Damn...you got me this time.


It is? I tough it was a OUYA exclusive first and then was ported over.

 

OUYA only true next generaion console confirmed!!



"Hardware design isn’t about making the most powerful thing you can.
Today most hardware design is left to other companies, but when you make hardware without taking into account the needs of the eventual software developers, you end up with bloated hardware full of pointless excess. From the outset one must consider design from both a hardware and software perspective."

Gunpei Yoko

biggamejames79 said:
Sales is a better measure of success than critical ratings. Money talks - opinions walks.

This especially ...



5 should be average
6 should be above average
7 should be great
8 and above AAA

Maybe reviews are following a better format than the 7-10 scale from last gen



 

mM

I know that you are sarcastic but I really find the new gen games pretty boring atm well, not boring but also not worth to buy a new console for. Even Forza didn't help me and I'm a big Forza or racing game fan in general.



I gotta say i was expecting a higher score from all the hype of this game. Looks like a another rent to me.



Praise the One.