By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Why Xbox One Will Catch Up To Playstation 4 in Performance.

FlamingWeazel said:
Jega said:
Another example put 512MB of ram into the PS4 and see what happens to the graphics.


LOL  how is that the same thing, then the system is ram starved, but both habe 8 gbs of ram. Take out the ps4 gpu , anyone can use hypotheticals...... Amount of ram and ram speed is not the sme thing nor relevant.  Yes you need ram, but esram wont make one system with a weaker gpu pefform better it's impossible.

 

Show me a benchmark of a PC with a 40% better gpu but slower ram where it performed worse in games? 

The PS4 GPU is said to be 50% faster than the GPU in the Xbox One. You guys really think that difference will actually translate

on your tv.

The PS4 GPU would have to be about 3x more powerful for you to see a difference in performance.



Around the Network
Jega said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Jega said:
Another example put 512MB of ram into the PS4 and see what happens to the graphics.


LOL  how is that the same thing, then the system is ram starved, but both habe 8 gbs of ram. Take out the ps4 gpu , anyone can use hypotheticals...... Amount of ram and ram speed is not the sme thing nor relevant.  Yes you need ram, but esram wont make one system with a weaker gpu pefform better it's impossible.

 

Show me a benchmark of a PC with a 40% better gpu but slower ram where it performed worse in games? 

The PS4 GPU is said to be 50% faster than the GPU in the Xbox One. You guys really think that difference will actually translate

on your tv.

The PS4 GPU would have to be about 3x more powerful for you to see a difference in performance.

LOL we see a diff in perfromance now where have you been? COD ghosts, Tomb raider, BF4, Thief, Watch dogs..........seriously. Most games  on PS4 are processing 30-50% more pixels then x1 is. What you said is baloney, even a small GPU upgrade is noticeable, again look at some benchmarks. Why is titanfall only 792 p with Frame rate issues? Why is almost every game not a sports game way lower frame rate and resolution on x 1? It's not sdk and drivers LMAO.

It is lunacy to think 32 MB esram can offset sonys better architetur and 40% GPU compute advantage.,

 

Waiting or some benchmarks.



FlamingWeazel said:
Jega said:
Another example put 512MB of ram into the PS4 and see what happens to the graphics.


LOL  how is that the same thing, then the system is ram starved, but both habe 8 gbs of ram. Take out the ps4 gpu , anyone can use hypotheticals...... Amount of ram and ram speed is not the sme thing nor relevant.  Yes you need ram, but esram wont make one system with a weaker gpu pefform better it's impossible.

 

Show me a benchmark of a PC with a 40% better gpu but slower ram where it performed worse in games?  HINT They don't exist, and ps4 has faster unified pool is better then slower ram with 32 mb esram. 32 is too tiny and another middleman to get to the gpu and cpu.

There you go again looking at the number and not the type of ram.

Example, both the xbox one and ps4 have 8 gigs of ram but the difference is about 100GB/s because of the TYPE of ram

ddr3 vs ddr 5 different TYPES of ram

 

Xbox One 32MB of SRAM 192GB/s vs PS4 8 GIGabyte of ram 176BG/s, both theoretical performance.

 

Stop looking at just the number and look at the TYPE of ram.



Jega said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Jega said:
Another example put 512MB of ram into the PS4 and see what happens to the graphics.


LOL  how is that the same thing, then the system is ram starved, but both habe 8 gbs of ram. Take out the ps4 gpu , anyone can use hypotheticals...... Amount of ram and ram speed is not the sme thing nor relevant.  Yes you need ram, but esram wont make one system with a weaker gpu pefform better it's impossible.

 

Show me a benchmark of a PC with a 40% better gpu but slower ram where it performed worse in games?  HINT They don't exist, and ps4 has faster unified pool is better then slower ram with 32 mb esram. 32 is too tiny and another middleman to get to the gpu and cpu.

There you go again looking at the number and not the type of ram.

Example, both the xbox one and ps4 have 8 gigs of ram but the difference is about 100GB/s because of the type of ram

ddr3 vs ddr 5 differnt types of ram.

32MB of SRAM 192GB/s vs PS4 8 GIGabyte of ram 176BG/s, both theoretical performance.

Stop looking at just the number and look at the TYPE of ram.


The ram is NOT going to help a weak er gpu..............Again you CANNOT add up theroritical numbers like that and geta  total, it's BS and it doesn;t work like that they don't get added together.

 

I repeat, nothing can offset the GPU advantage., Everything you said is totally incorrect.,You also keep ignoring that 32 MB is simply too small to make any real difference.

 

Where is a benchamark?



Who made this thread? oh its jega move along people.



Around the Network



e=mc^2

Gaming on: PS4 Pro, Switch, SNES Mini, Wii U, PC (i5-7400, GTX 1060)



FlamingWeazel said:
Jega said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Jega said:
Another example put 512MB of ram into the PS4 and see what happens to the graphics.


LOL  how is that the same thing, then the system is ram starved, but both habe 8 gbs of ram. Take out the ps4 gpu , anyone can use hypotheticals...... Amount of ram and ram speed is not the sme thing nor relevant.  Yes you need ram, but esram wont make one system with a weaker gpu pefform better it's impossible.

 

Show me a benchmark of a PC with a 40% better gpu but slower ram where it performed worse in games?  HINT They don't exist, and ps4 has faster unified pool is better then slower ram with 32 mb esram. 32 is too tiny and another middleman to get to the gpu and cpu.

There you go again looking at the number and not the type of ram.

Example, both the xbox one and ps4 have 8 gigs of ram but the difference is about 100GB/s because of the type of ram

ddr3 vs ddr 5 differnt types of ram.

32MB of SRAM 192GB/s vs PS4 8 GIGabyte of ram 176BG/s, both theoretical performance.

Stop looking at just the number and look at the TYPE of ram.


The ram is NOT going to help a weak er gpu..............Again you CANNOT add up theroritical numbers like that and geta  total, it's BS and it doesn;t work like that they don't get added together.

 

I repeat, nothing can offset the GPU advantage., Everything you said is totally incorrect.,You also keep ignoring that 32 MB is simply too small to make any real difference.

 

Where is a benchamark?

I am not trying to offset the GPU advantage the PS4 has, what you are not getting is that you cannot just look at the power of

the GPU and say Playstation 4 can perform better than the Xbox One. There are other factors such as memory bandwith and CPU speeds.

If the ps4 and xbox one were made up of just a GPU then I would not have an argument.



With your logic i can put 64gb of ram and a gtx 9800 together to form the best gaming pc in history



This gave me a good laugh for today,