FlamingWeazel said:
Jega said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Jega said:
Another example put 512MB of ram into the PS4 and see what happens to the graphics. |
LOL how is that the same thing, then the system is ram starved, but both habe 8 gbs of ram. Take out the ps4 gpu , anyone can use hypotheticals...... Amount of ram and ram speed is not the sme thing nor relevant. Yes you need ram, but esram wont make one system with a weaker gpu pefform better it's impossible.
Show me a benchmark of a PC with a 40% better gpu but slower ram where it performed worse in games? HINT They don't exist, and ps4 has faster unified pool is better then slower ram with 32 mb esram. 32 is too tiny and another middleman to get to the gpu and cpu.
|
There you go again looking at the number and not the type of ram.
Example, both the xbox one and ps4 have 8 gigs of ram but the difference is about 100GB/s because of the type of ram
ddr3 vs ddr 5 differnt types of ram.
32MB of SRAM 192GB/s vs PS4 8 GIGabyte of ram 176BG/s, both theoretical performance.
Stop looking at just the number and look at the TYPE of ram.
|
The ram is NOT going to help a weak er gpu..............Again you CANNOT add up theroritical numbers like that and geta total, it's BS and it doesn;t work like that they don't get added together.
I repeat, nothing can offset the GPU advantage., Everything you said is totally incorrect.,You also keep ignoring that 32 MB is simply too small to make any real difference.
Where is a benchamark?
|
I am not trying to offset the GPU advantage the PS4 has, what you are not getting is that you cannot just look at the power of
the GPU and say Playstation 4 can perform better than the Xbox One. There are other factors such as memory bandwith and CPU speeds.
If the ps4 and xbox one were made up of just a GPU then I would not have an argument.
