Quantcast
Everyone is Always Trying To Sabotage Sony

Forums - Sony Discussion - Everyone is Always Trying To Sabotage Sony

klumminati said:
What am I going to do about it? Laugh at you, just like majority of the sane people here. I'm going to get Zoo Tycoon but if the review isn't up to par, I'd still buy it. Why don't you buy Knack and do a review about it?


Well just looking at one review here:  "Playing Knack is like watching a dull movie on a plane – it's tolerable if all you want is a way to pass the time, but it's not something you'd seek out for its own sake. I finished in about 11 hours and, challenges, co-op, and secrets aside, there's just not much here worth recommending." -- IGN

 

You know if you're going to throw out humongous chunks  ( challenges, co-op, and secrets )of the game to score it, that's not really being that honest about its merits.



Around the Network

OP : Do you even understand what Opinion means or even personal preferences? Just because you love the game ,, and think its great, doesn't mean the rest of us gamers or reviewers havE to love the game . To expect ,, just makes you a stupid fanboy. Just saying, no insult intended. People have their own taste and their opinon. I tried and i find it boring and would give it a low score. That goes to the other members in this site. If you give it 9 cause you love it ,, then good on you . i am proud of you for loving the game lol. Therefore Opinion is not fact and your taste will be different ot my taste as so on.



Also jsut because the game has lots of thinsg to ,, doesn't automatically make it a good game. Remember its quality over quantity and in taht instance teh quality ain't to good for the game and plus its reviewer opinion of knack.



I feel so sad on this thread, this really can't be serious.



But war... war never changes

Quit your bitchin.

Seriously, the console is soon going to be selling significant ly more than x1 anyway so people will be dissing it. Have some balls, sir.



Around the Network
dane007 said:
Also jsut because the game has lots of thinsg to ,, doesn't automatically make it a good game. Remember its quality over quantity and in taht instance teh quality ain't to good for the game and plus its reviewer opinion of knack.


I just want to see Dave Halverson's review of the game.  He has a track record of taking games like this that have received lackluster reviews and seen a lot of hidden merit in them over the years and from everything that I've heard about "Knack" it seems like another one that he would score quite highly in comparison to the other critics in the industry.



EdHieron said:

You know if you're going to throw out humongous chunks  ( challenges, co-op, and secrets )of the game to score it, that's not really being that honest about its merits.

EdHieron said:
The only thing you do in Gears is run, shoot, and take cover and maybe there's one puzzle scene and about a two minute scene in the vehicle.

You really should start taking your own advice...



@OP theres a difference between saying this : "I just want to see Dave Halverson's review of the game. He has a track record of taking games like this that have received lackluster reviews and seen a lot of hidden merit in them over the years and from everything that I've heard about "Knack" it seems like another one that he would score quite highly in comparison to the other critics in the industry.
"
and writing a tantrum butt hurt article where you try to play Sony as a victim lol. If thats all you wanted to do then say that . Why did have go through writing a tantrum article?



fordy said:
EdHieron said:

You know if you're going to throw out humongous chunks  ( challenges, co-op, and secrets )of the game to score it, that's not really being that honest about its merits.

EdHieron said:
The only thing you do in Gears is run, shoot, and take cover and maybe there's one puzzle scene and about a two minute scene in the vehicle.

You really should start taking your own advice...


That is all that you do in the single player version of Gears, so I was.



dane007 said:
@OP theres a difference between saying this : "I just want to see Dave Halverson's review of the game. He has a track record of taking games like this that have received lackluster reviews and seen a lot of hidden merit in them over the years and from everything that I've heard about "Knack" it seems like another one that he would score quite highly in comparison to the other critics in the industry.
"
and writing a tantrum butt hurt article where you try to play Sony as a victim lol. If thats all you wanted to do then say that . Why did have go through writing a tantrum article?


Because Sony has largely been a victim since the beginning of the last gen.