R&D should be much lower than the PS3 but still quite expensive. Like you said who knows how long it will take for them to make an actual "profit"
R&D should be much lower than the PS3 but still quite expensive. Like you said who knows how long it will take for them to make an actual "profit"
Max King of the Wild said:
|
I read your post incorrectly, I thought you wrote that you WILL purchase those things. Moving along...
cheesecake said: well, hate to break it to you Sony, but not everyone uses PS Plus/pays for Online. |
Yes, but not everyone is going to buy only 1 game either. So those who don't get PS+ will be offset by those who buy multiple games and/or extra accessories.
Kasz216 said: So they aren't counting R&D in "Hardware loss". So who knows what he's including/not including in the statement. |
Yes I agree with this. Sony did really learn their lesson, $60 is really low if you consider the specs. Wonder if it will have a small price cut in its second year..
Gotta admit, they played it safe, and in doing so, smart, this upcoming gen.
for comparison's sake, does anyone know how much do the other guys take a loss on their consoles?
MS is supposedly going to break even at $499 with X1(but who knows now after their whole scrambling to up the specs thing) and I believe that Nibtendo was taking like a $25 loss with eac Wii U sold a while back. Nintendo said something like they would break even if each customer bought 1 game with their Wii U
OT: $60? I'm impressed
Only a $60 loss is great when you compare it to the $200 loss with PS3.
Keep games coming and get a big PS+ userbase and we will be seeing big profits in the next few Years!
Well they should make out like a bandit on me. Given I own over 60 PS3 titles in five years of owning that system safe to say PS4 will match that with me getting it near launch.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.