I remember talking with you before about 3DS and Vita graphics. You still spreading this stuff?

3D TVs have always sold better then HD TVs for same point in life spam

3D movies make up around 50% of box office sales with less then 10% of movies having a 3D screening, and 100% of movies having a 2D screening, with the 3D screenings only being up the first several weeks.

Do you honestly think the 2DS with NO earphone jack for 6.0 speaker surround sound (3D sound) and no 3D visuals is going to sell that much?

Besides, 240p SD (Standrd-Definition) 3D looks way more clearer looking then 2D 4K HD (High-Definition), and more anti-alising looking and more brighter & vivid & colorful looking. The fact that 3D has done more for images then HD says a lot. So forget about the three-dimensional look, how about the way more clearer looking image that is also more brighter looking and more vivid & colorful looking, that comes with the 3D effect being ON on the 3DS and 3D TVs on display at best buy and 3D Movies in theaters since Jack the Giant Slayer.

Mario Kart's system is its flaw.  It penalizes better players rather than the entire reason for multiplayer, win because you're the better player.  I didn't add several games on either side because I didn't think of them.  Dragon's Crown is a  great game and I didn't list that anywhere on the Vita section.  I also didn't bother adding games that aren't very good or if I haven't played them heard they aren't very good.  The only racing games I can think of that I've missed on the 3DS is Driver Renegade, Ridge Racer, and Asphalt Injection, haven't played any of them, but Ridge Racer and Asphalt Injection are both on the Vita as well, they don't look good, and they look better on Vita.  Do you still want me to add those to the lists?

You don't know how to put two and two together?  I made it a point to say I've heard it was a good game.  Obviously when I said nothing is better than the Vita games I've listed, I meant the ones on that list I've played.

The only unreleased game I listed was Killzone Mercenary, which I've played so I think it counts.  I don't know if Bravely Default is any good.  The ones that people praise all the time, even though I haven't played them, I listed them and made note that I haven't played them, but only if the games were released.  I originally had God of War Collection and Borderlands 2 on the list, but removed them as I've played t hose games, even if I didn't play them on the Vita, but I decided to be fair since the games aren't even close to release.

Well, seeing that I own both the 3DS and Vita that I've used to play these games(or the ones that I didn't play on consoles,) do you know where that bias comes from?  It comes from playing the  games and, you know, the games not being as good.  Usually that's why people don't like games, because the game isn't really good in their opinion.  That could be where the bias comes from.  I added one Vita game I haven't played to the list, Rayman Legends while I added more Nintendo games because of how much praise they receive.  I'd say if anything I was more favorable towards Nintendo.

Oh.  And where it's listed as "buyer's guide."  It means.  Buy a Vita.  Heh.  I'm just kidding.  It's a list of games that I or other people look favorably on for both systems.  The last section you wonder why I even listed the games since I bashed the 3DS and Vita games?  Because people see those titles listed as good games, in both the Vita and 3DS camp.  Same reason I listed games in other sections I don't think are very good, because other people like them.  They're  many popular games from different genres.

You should totally ask him for a source.  I don't think he'd give you a real one.

^

Kid Icarus: Uprising is more then 150 million polygons. The Vita could never do that many.

Even Donkey Kong Country Returns 3D is more then 150 polygons.

I'm not quite sure I understand.  Are ports automatically bad?

Source?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM11

The ARM11 CPU has 4 different names for its cores because there are 4 of them, and it focuses really heavily on synthesis which gives it an advantage over all other 4-core 1 GHz CPU in exchange of not being usable on non-Nintendo devices. And has redesign pipelines target up to 1 GHz which most sources back up these days, and growing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PICA200

PICA200 (2006) has always been 400 MHz max clock frequency which drains 0.5 Hz to 1.0 Hz of power and does 160Mtriangle/s (160 million polygons) which most sources on the Internet back up these days and growing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM11

The ARM11 CPU has 4 different names for its cores because there are 4 of them, and it focuses really heavily on synthesis which gives it an advantage over all other 4-core 1 GHz CPU in exchange of not being usable on non-Nintendo devices. And has redesign pipelines target up to 1 GHz which most sources back up these days, and growing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PICA200

PICA200 (2006) has always been 400 MHz max clock frequency which drains 0.5 Hz to 1.0 Hz of power and does 160Mtriangle/s (160 million polygons) which most sources on the Internet back up these days and growing.