By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - PS4 Now requires PS+ for MULTIPLAYER!

 

Are you jumping out because of the loss of free multiplayer?

Yes 191 17.83%
 
No 708 66.11%
 
See Results 172 16.06%
 
Total:1,071

As much as it's quite annoying, I can fully understand why they did it. With MS having a service at an identical price, but (at present) offers much less, it will still be used as a one up by many people. Sony is a business after all.



Around the Network
g911turbo said:
Pristine20 said:
mantlepiecek said:
Pristine20 said:
mantlepiecek said:

Terrible decision by sony. The decision to get a PS4 which seemed so easy now seems very difficult. Can't buy something that will lock my game's component unless I pay every year, regardless of what I get in return because we already pay for the game in the first place.


Cant have everything. Money is needed to maintain the servers and how do you think they could pull off that price tag? You'd rather go to the likes of steam and X1 where you dlicense the games you buy? The servers still belong to sony not you and it's still reasonable for them to charge you to use them.

Honestly, I personally would have preferrred $599 with free online (because it truly is the better value long term) but we saw what was the better strategy with the ps3 and 360 launch. Sony just wised up.

But third party games have nothing to do with sony. And yes, steam is definitely a good option.

Servers costing money....is a nothingness. The low price tag I don't care.

They should have kept an option. A very basic option of free multiplayer.


Eh, I'm pretty sure 3rd party online games are still played on Sony's servers.

If you would rather pay $599 and have free online, I'm with you but as we saw with PS360 this gen, most gamers prefer it this way.

Actually, you can thank Microsoft for this.  They gave Sony the window of opportunity they have been looking for.  No DRM, no DRM, no DRM... and pay for online games.  People still cheer.

 

"You don't have to be the best, just better than everybody else."


I honestly still feel that Sony initially intended to have the drm thing as well but the M$ fallout caused them to change their mind. They can thank M$ in the sense that they copied 360 strategy i.e the subsidized console strategy. Thats M$ was constantly able to undercut on price. At $399, sony will be bleeding money if not for the subscription model. i've always justified not getting PS+ even though I desperately wanted the cloud saves especially. Now I can purchase it with no regrets.



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

Booyah said:
I guess all the Nintendo fans will have to pick up the banner that all the Sony fans are dropping now with the free online.

I paid for a gold account for a few years because all my friends played on Live before my 360 dumped out. It's really not that big of a deal but it is funny to see the Sony fans that were so against Live make a complete 180 on the situation.


Im not doing a complete 180 Im still against it...I stay online on Ps3 so that news sucks but  just glad they got the no DRM right and 399 .. still against paying online but what can I do? stand outside of their office with a sign.. still probably wont be a day one purchase for me anyway made that mistake with ps3 and a 600 plus tax console not making that mistake again unless i know the games that are launch appeal to me



THe oNLY TRue STuPiDiTY iS THe aCCePTaNCe oF iGNoRaNCe 

PSNTAG K_I_N_G__COKE

  The King Of The Iron Fist tournament

lol well now sony fanboys accept this because sony is doing it lol
they are the most pathetic of them all.

~Mod Edit~

This post has been moderated.

-Smeags



CGI-Quality said:
Michael-5 said:

Question: What are the payment options?

Is there an option to join for a month at a time for $5? I'm hear there is, but a full year subscription comes at a discount for $50.

If that's the case, I'm all in. $50 for a couple months of play is too much, but $5-$10 for a month or two? That's fine. I just need a system that works for my gaming habits. (Single Player for 80% off the year).

Jack said: "for less than $5 a month". $49.99 a year

I hope they make a feasible monthly plan, I only play online for a month or two at a time between 6-15 months of offline. So an annual plan doesn't work for me

If there is no short term plan, I'll have to hold off my PS4 purchase to offset this extra fee.

Still, nice to hear PS4 plays retail games forever.



What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results

Around the Network

well my solution will be simple, free multi-player games on my PS3 and PC, for as long as they last, and stick to single player games only on my PS4!, I am not happy about the online Multi-player requirement being you will need playstation plus+. not going to be paying for it. still play single player online games though, so thats at least something.



I AM BOLO

100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...

ps:

Proud psOne/2/3/p owner.  I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.

Yeah now that I'm coming off the high that was the Sony e3 that kind of sucks, but I'll still get the 4 for the single player games. Maybe in the future ill get + but I'm glad they are not forcing me to be online like other company's :)



I hated the pay to play online of XBL Gold, but I'm on PS+ and I'll probably remain on PS+ because of the additional content that you get for no additional fee, so while I think online multiplayer being locked being a paywall is complete bs for those of us who don't want to get PS+, doesn't bother me since I'm already on it and I like the service.

It's better than XBL Gold though. XBL Gold is giving two free games a month until the launch of the Xbox One, and then that's it. Sony will continue to give us free games a month for PS3, Vita, and PS4 when it's added, although Drive Club PS+ edition will be a gimped, but free version. It's atleast a better version than getting nothing but still requiring to pay a monthly fee like Microsoft is doing.

In addition to this. The only thing added to PS+ is the multiplayer, so everything else can still included for free. The share button to record and upload videos, cross game chat, apps like Netflix, etc.

PS+
-Discounted Games
-Automatic Game Updates
-Early Access to Beta Programs
-Instant Game Collection
-Immersive Multiplayer On PS4



what if $400 is just for the cheaper model while $500 is for the other model?



Honestly you guys against it because you want to save money, you know the best way to save money? PS+