Whoever said Homosexuality is a condition which is harmful to the human race?

You answered yourself why homosexuality should be "cured." You said" "regardless of age, you have a right to do what you want with your body."

So homosexuals who don't want to "shove dildos up your ass, or (even better) get your buddy to fuck you" Are you saying we should force them to? People are born homosexually, either through some biological process or some psychological process which affects people when they're young. Regardless, homosexuals do not have a choice in the matter. You said it yourself, homosexuality is not a choice.

So why are you so adament into forcing people to be homosexual, when not all homosexuals wish to remain homosexual?

Your body, your buisness, but if you're a homosexual, you're not allowed to be heterosexual?

Should sex defining traits be treated? Depends, isn't Down Syndrome having a 3rd Chromosome? That should be treated always. I dunno what YY give you, an infertile female? If so, yes that should be treated. As for other traits, I'm not aware of any positive mutations in this aspect, so IMO yes they should be treated.

As for the surgery itself, I think it's gross. I'd be more into converting people genders if they actually could to it accuratly. It doesn't matter if she is lacking ovaries, but the idea that some girls out there have inverted penis's for vagina's....that's not a substitution, and while that individual might be a happier person, what about the people she sleeps with? Do they not have a right to know if they are having sex with a Vagina or an Inverted Penis?

Should people who have participated in sex change opperations, at the level of quality they have now, be treated in the same way people with HIV are treated? Legally (In Canada) HIV carriers have to inform their sexual partners about their condition before they can have sex. Thus if someone contracts HIV and wasn't aware of you carrying, you can be in serious trouble. Sex Change doesn't have any contractable desease, but IMO it's equally as unwelcoming. Should we force these people to tell their partners about their conditions?

Can you cure acceptance to homosexuality? If not, is it wrong to offer homosexuals who wish to be heterosexuals under pressure a way out?

What about homosexuals with or without family pressures, who just want to be heterosexual? What about a Mama's Boy who just wants to make mom proud and give her grandchildren, and have a family?

A "cure" may be administered incorrectly, in some cases, but is it worth not having at all?

What about a cure which turns homosexuals into bisexuals, favoring the opposite gender. What's your thoughts on that? This way a homo gets everything, does he not (Family, maybe children, but still stays gay).

NO and NO. And are not opinions, NO and NO are FACTS.

And are you kidding us with that poll?????

Homosexuality IS NOT A CHOICE.
Homosexuality IS NOT A ILLNESS. So the word "cure" is incorrect and so immature.

NONE of the poll options adheres to reality.

Sounds like an ultra conservative religious stance from the Dark Ages. It was not until the last quarter of the twentieth century that homosexuality was no longer regarded as a mental illness.or a criminal act in western developed civilised nations. Homosexuals are still executed in some Islamic nations: Middle East and parts of Africa.

ABSOLUTELY YES. YOU ARE IGNORANT.

Do you think Heterosexuality can be "cured"?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeMvUlxXyz8

Red hair, lefthanded, blue eyes, homosexuality,... all is the same.

Is not a problem, is not an illness.

I don't care about people's sexuality. Its trivial. That's like caring about someone haircut.

What a disgusting topic. Of course it can't be cured you sick bastard!

nice one.