Hey Superchunk, I agree, I agree, but I find it more interesting that that specific wall of the Pentagon was reenforced right before 9/11 & mostly empty of people as a result of renovations. I'm just suggesting you not put all your eggs in one potentially weak basket.
EDIT: The burdon of proof is on the US government though, and they have a tape from a gas station down the highway a half mile away that clearly shows what happened. They have failed to prove what hit the Pentagon & even played games with releasing any proof. After the attack they released I think one single frame from the on site camera that showed a fireball. After people demanded more proof (Through the freedom of information act?) they released a very slow frame rate video that showed right before, one frame that showed a trail of smoke going all the way through the frame, and then the same fireball. The then newly released tape was flaunted as solid proof even though it showed nothing (except the trail from a chemical rocket engine?) and news anchors said things like "Maybe now THOSE people will shut up." .
EDIT: Another trump card debunkers play is the "It would take thousands of people involved to pull off 9/11, why haven't any talked?" The truth is it would only take a room of a dozen top military & government figures to pull their strings and issue their orders to allow the attacks to happen. It's not like they told the fighter pilots anything but "War game this morning, go fly 500 miles out into the Atlantic." & the commander who gave that order was himself simply told what to do, it was his superiors superior who was one of the dozen in that room who made it happen. As for the potential of placing explosives in the WTC, that could have been done by a small special forces team in the weeks leading up to 9/11.