Nsanity said:
I have seen this been tossed around a few times: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmSmlk-Wo4uhdEhXMy1GcmFERGQ2TGtkdll2OVBXNGc#gid=0 |
Thanks.
But wth are they bickering about then? 2,6 Billion loss is not too far away from 2,996 billion and 4,58 billion loss is not too far away from 4,9 billion loss. Is it the conclusion drawn in the article?