and here we go again, sales apperantly mean quality. when ever i get into a discussion about games that gets thrown out alot, but this game sold better  ect ect. and here is a link to an IGN article, you know IGN one of the biggest gaming websites in the world. do they mention smart as and guacomole in it?

http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/10/12/nycc-upcoming-playstation-vita-games-galore

I gather you weren't into gaming when the SNES, PSX, and Dreamcast were respectively launched.

If one game over 90 (itself an "enhanced" port of a 5 year old game) is the best launch lineup you've ever seen.

http://www.metacritic.com/browse/games/release-date/available/dreamcast/metascore - look at how many of those titles came out in the first 12/13 months!

Metacritic doesn't have SNES games - and only 200 or so PSX games out of the 1000 plus released , and of those, reveiews are pretty sparse, so not giving a fair average - but to cite 3 - that would easily average over 90 if metacritic was a thing then - if I hadn't lost all my Mean Machines and EGM's from the 90's in a flood - i'd probably go dig em out!

PSX - Tekken, Ridge Racer and Wipeout - in the launch month - were absolute AAA at the time.

SNES - MarioWorld, ActRaiser, F-Zero - all absolute AAA.

Crikey - even the original Gameboy had MarioLand and Tetris at launch.

And 3DS got Ocarina, SM3d and SMK7 in its first year. One an enhanced port of a 10+ year old game.

This "Vita has the best launch lineup ever" is factually incorrect. Big Time. Critical wise, sales wise and historically speaking against other launches in both those categories. Whatever way you want to slice it.

I've nothing against the console, and will most likely get one at some stage - but I just wish some people would realise - when you point at the sky and tell people it's green, most people will just shrug their shoulders and go "whatever". Credit people with some intelligence - when they hear a deluded (or downright false) statement - they're likely to just walk away and say "that guy's nuts" - rather than argue with a crazy person.

Vita looks OK, it has some alright games, and more on the way. Tearaway could be a 95+. But all this ranting and raving and undue hyping makes a lot of people sound like a gaggle of FOX news pundits before election day. "Landslide for Romney Vita!" So wrapped up in their own bubbles, that the reality outside is pretty distorted.  And rational minded people couldn't be bothered to tell the emperor that he's wearing no clothes, so have a little chuckle, and get on with it.

But 3DS has more games. It has more games upcoming. It has a higher number of higher rated games.

Your list is incomplete, just look at the Most Wanted section if you want ot check for all the games. I bolded what I added.

So 3 exclusive Vita games, a port, and 3 enhanced remakes.

and 12 exclusive 3DS games, a port, and an enchanced remake.

This kinda favors 3DS....just a bit.

 3 angry birds games which cost 40 bucks where you could get them all on your andriod for free with more levels. 

They can?! that is cool to know you've done market research and found that every 3ds owner also has an android device with them at all times too. You also need to put up with adverts all over the droid version of Angry birds unless you pay for it as well as just the convience factor of having the trilogy in a tiny cart for the 3ds along with other good portable games rather than having to carry around 2 devices to save 40euros.