First off, very few religious people deny evolution by now. 2nd, evolution does in no way disprove existence of God by the slightest. I think this is a flamebait/troll thread to be honest
First off, very few religious people deny evolution by now. 2nd, evolution does in no way disprove existence of God by the slightest. I think this is a flamebait/troll thread to be honest
I'm not gonna give you proof because it would mean doing a lot of research, but I'm just going to say that you can observe evolution easily with virus and bacteria, which have a short lifespan and multiply very rapidly and in great quantity, and therefore evolution happens quicker with them.
That's why, when you create a medicine against them, they eventually become immune to it, because the ones that were immune to begin with are the ones that successfully multiply.
That's why penicillin was a great success back when it was invented but is not that useful today.
No troll is too much for me to handle. I rehabilitate trolls, I train people. I am the Troll Whisperer.
Runa216 said:
|
Are you kidding me? Of course it requires faith to believe in. Since it cannot be proven 100% beyond reasonable doubt it requires at least a small amount of faith/belief in its most basic form.
Also, how can you say there is NO evidence of a God when hundreds of millions of people have observed acts that seem to give credence to a divine being? When all logic is defied and someone specifically observes an act of this nature themselves, that's a big thing. Sure you can try to call it "chance" or try to explain things scientifically, but I'm mostly just trying to point out that there are plenty of observations made out there to support a god. Science and it's evidence is based on observations, and there are just as many observations supporting a divine being/divine intervention as there are scientific based observations for theories.
GameOver22 said:
That is possible. The reason why people generally avoid making that argument is that it violates Ockham's razor (the idea that the simplest explanation is the best explanation). If evolution completely explains the origin of life, there is no reason to bring God into the picture as well. It just makes the explanation more complicated than it needs to be. |
Ahh there is the Rub. Glad you brought that up! William (of Ockham or Occam) used the principle to justify many conclusions, including the statement that "God's existence cannot be deduced by reason alone." That one didn't make him very popular with the Pope. Also, using the prinicple of "the idea that the simplest explanation is the best explanation" is not all together accurate. The Razor is more of a guideline (hence being a principle) that says ""when you have two competing theories that make exactly the same predictions, the simpler one is the better." Better, not best. Ockham fully admitted his theories could be wrong or that they could be the only explanation.
Sir Isaac Newton said it the best I think "We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances."
kowenicki said:
he might also want to read The God Delusion too.... |
That might be overload... but I agree. Both I believe are essential reads if you're really interested in this sort of debate.
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...
nightsurge said:
Are you kidding me? Of course it requires faith to believe in. Since it cannot be proven 100% beyond reasonable doubt it requires at least a small amount of faith/belief in its most basic form. Also, how can you say there is NO evidence of a God when hundreds of millions of people have observed acts that seem to give credence to a divine being? When all logic is defied and someone specifically observes an act of this nature themselves, that's a big thing. Sure you can try to call it "chance" or try to explain things scientifically, but I'm mostly just trying to point out that there are plenty of observations made out there to support a god. Science and it's evidence is based on observations, and there are just as many observations supporting a divine being/divine intervention as there are scientific based observations for theories. |
Okay...here's the issue. It cannot be proven 100%, no, but it already has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. It's observed daily, we were able to test, restest, create, and recreate evolution in bacteria and plants. To deny that is foolish. evolution IS real, and while there is that infinitecimal chance we're wrong, evolution has been as proven as anything is going to get.
Those who deny that are foolish.
As for the whole God thing..that has nothing to do with it. Religious theory and evolution are NOT mutually exclusive and nowhere on this site, this thread, or the other infamous thread have I once tried to convince anyone that God is not real or that they shouldn't believe. The entire original argument was based on the fact that if religion wants to be taken seriously as an origin theory, or to keep having its claws dug into our collective social psyche, we should stop treating it with kids gloves, and it should lose its supposed immunity to criticism.
I'm not trying to cause shit, but people seem to jump on any bandwagon they can rather than addressing the issue initially brought up...which has been completely ignored in lieu of much more heated arguments about various oppressions, insensitivity, and mutually exclusive assumptions.
Seriously, stop that.
My Console Library:
PS5, Switch, XSX
PS4, PS3, PS2, PS1, WiiU, Wii, GCN, N64 SNES, XBO, 360
3DS, DS, GBA, Vita, PSP, Android
Haven't you seen X-Men First Class?All is explained there..
Religions Are not the worts thing, People are, using it for they own selfish belive, Ghandi, marie theresa and so on Are Pure exemple of what those relegious belive could have been at best.
Evolution, or bigbang or what else, Is just the question of How it Happen. Like Stan said In southpark. Why Can evolution cant be the anwser to how God created it ?.
Existence of a God, An Ernegie of creation, a beared man can probably work hand to hand with evolution. An House Can't be made without Wood and tools.
The question, will always be ok bigbang happen, but what was before then ? and before that, What was before god and so on.