Lens of Truth has just announced that Killzone 3 is the console graphics king, handily beating Crysis in the head to head.

Conclusion: Although Crysis 2 looks fantastic on both the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, the graphics crown still belongs to Guerrilla’s Killzone 3. Not only does Killzone 3 look graphically better, the performance its more stable throughout. That being said, with serious graphical contenders on the horizon such as Battlefield 3 and RAGE, how long can Killzone 3 hold on to the title? We’ll just have to wait and see!

well, do you guys agree, or are they wrong?

http://www.lensoftruth.com/head2head/head2head-killzone-3-vs-crysis-2-analysis/

edit: more proof that ign lied

does anyone know of a way to contact ign, to show them this and DF, to show them they lied

Frankly, I think game design is more important than polygon count and 'sharp graphics'.  In the end, I'll still say something like Super Mario Galaxy, Assassins Creed II or Batman: Arkham Asylum have the 'best graphics' in my opinion.

And its just that, an opinion.  Unless you're citing a very specific peramiter for what makes the best graphics.

I think that killzone 3 is better overall while crysis 2 is great its also a total mess the single play is unbeliveably buggy and the multiplayer is IMO completly f**ked

I KNEW IT!!!!!

 *Tries to care*

Edit: *Fails*

We all just got KILLZONEEEDDD!!!!

I still like Uncharted 2 much better. But who cares.

I hope Selnor isn't crying :')!

i wonder if Kowenicki, Nsanity, and Selnor will come to this thread?

never had a doubt about it!

but, although Killzone 3 looks and plays fantastic, i still would argue the proper term is not "graphics king" but "visual achievment on a technical scale king" i will agree though it doesn't sound nearly as impressive .