rccsetzer said:
So, perhaps it will have these things? If so i will be very, very happy. Come on Nintendo! Bring on a "Zelda Final Fantasy"! |
Yes, it's possible, though it's not going to be a "Zelda Final Fantasy" by any stretch of the imagination.
What made you think they weren't doing it?
Nintendo will definitely be spending a lot of money on this game.
Click this button, you know you want to! [Subscribe]
Watch me on YouTube!
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheRadishBros
~~~~ Mario Kart 8 drove far past my expectations! Never again will I doubt the wheels of a Monster Franchise! :0 ~~~~
rccsetzer said:
|
You'll probably be very, very disappointed.
Khuutra said:
What makes you think that it won't have these things? Why speak as if "not using a high budget" is confirmed? |
don't get me wrong, the zelda formula is pretty much flawless, but basically every zelda game except a small exception like majoras mask are pretty much the exactly same game, It's never pushed graphics engines, it's never pushed production values, it's story has never stepped far outside its own grasp, the first and so far only wii outing that matters is the definition of waggle and there hasn't been a single mechanic ever introduced into the game since the dungeon system that was in any way new or fresh.
In terms of game budgets, I'd say nintendo probably has some of the lowest. They really don't put a whole lot into their games and tend to just stick with what they do best.
It's this reason Nintendo is so rich, and its also this reason that Nintendo games tend to be pretty much all definitions of "rehash".
But the most important thing that comes out of all this, and the thing that most Nintendo fans should be proud of is, Nintendo never ever puts any of those flashy things above gameplay. If the zelda formula is working as intended, why go around and mess it up? Innovation is a catchy term, but it does not a good game make. In fact, its usually just a gimmick. And people always talk about Nintendo being full of gimmicks when their games (The one thing we should all care about) have pretty much been gimmick free. (I dont count wii sports or wii fit stuff as games in my opinion they are just bonus software and are equal to say, the PS3's blu-ray drive)
I sure hope they dont change the Zelda formula too much. While I could not bare to finish twilight princess, I've loved every other Zelda even spirit tracks.
If there is one way to ruin Zelda it would be to have it in first person view.
I will not accept it.
If it isn't turnbased it isn't worth playing 
(mostly)
And shepherds we shall be,
For Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, That our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti. -----The Boondock Saints
BW_JP said:
don't get me wrong, the zelda formula is pretty much flawless, but basically every zelda game except a small exception like majoras mask are pretty much the exactly same game, It's never pushed graphics engines, it's never pushed production values, it's story has never stepped far outside its own grasp, the first and so far only wii outing that matters is the definition of waggle and there hasn't been a single mechanic ever introduced into the game since the dungeon system that was in any way new or fresh.
In terms of game budgets, I'd say nintendo probably has some of the lowest. They really don't put a whole lot into their games and tend to just stick with what they do best. But the most important thing that comes out of all this, and the thing that most Nintendo fans should be proud of is, Nintendo never ever puts any of those flashy things above gameplay. If the zelda formula is working as intended, why go around and mess it up? Innovation is a catchy term, but it does not a good game make. In fact, its usually just a gimmick. And people always talk about Nintendo being full of gimmicks when their games (The one thing we should all care about) have pretty much been gimmick free. (I dont count wii sports or wii fit stuff as games in my opinion they are just bonus software and are equal to say, the PS3's blu-ray drive)
|
Say F-ing what??? you got to be kidding me...
If it isn't turnbased it isn't worth playing (mostly)
And shepherds we shall be,
For Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, That our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti. -----The Boondock Saints
BW_JP said:
don't get me wrong, the zelda formula is pretty much flawless, but basically every zelda game except a small exception like majoras mask are pretty much the exactly same game, It's never pushed graphics engines, it's never pushed production values, it's story has never stepped far outside its own grasp, the first and so far only wii outing that matters is the definition of waggle and there hasn't been a single mechanic ever introduced into the game since the dungeon system that was in any way new or fresh.
In terms of game budgets, I'd say nintendo probably has some of the lowest. They really don't put a whole lot into their games and tend to just stick with what they do best. But the most important thing that comes out of all this, and the thing that most Nintendo fans should be proud of is, Nintendo never ever puts any of those flashy things above gameplay. If the zelda formula is working as intended, why go around and mess it up? Innovation is a catchy term, but it does not a good game make. In fact, its usually just a gimmick. And people always talk about Nintendo being full of gimmicks when their games (The one thing we should all care about) have pretty much been gimmick free. (I dont count wii sports or wii fit stuff as games in my opinion they are just bonus software and are equal to say, the PS3's blu-ray drive) |
The "budget" comment was the only part rlevant to my post so it's all I'm responding to.
You're wrong. Super Mario Galaxy was supposed to have cost as much to make as a low-tier HD blockbuster.
And you hope they odn't change the Zelda formula too much, bu you couldn' play through Twilight Princess, which had th formula unchanged from Ocarina of Time? THat makes no sense.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
