And now it's 50 gazibillion votes against Sabby. -_-

I wonder if he'll go absent again....

Top of the list, FoS: Dgc1808

Day One he was the first to vote for Hatmoza.  His reasoning was in response to Hatmoza's first post pro-town claim:

Moving to Day Two, he finds me suspicious enough to vote for.  Let's look at the reasoning:

2) You'll notice that after Trangentspree responded, I answered a few questions he had and moved on.  He's not completely off the hook, but I'm satisfied for now.  You make it sound like I'm still after him for the same thing.

3) That's fine, however it doesn't give you an excuse to stop scum hunting.  By the way, how is this a reason to vote for me?

If you want to question some of my methods, then fine, but I don't think this is anywhere near good enough to cause a vote.  I think it is an overreaction, and that makes me suspicious.

Who else does he find suspicious today?  SciFiBoy.  Yes, the one person who has been cleared by the cop.

It looks like something else popped up while writing this:

Further down my list, FoS Zexen_Lowe.

That was a very strong reaction to what was just a summation of Vetteman's Day One activity.  I didn't see any commentary in there, it was fact.  Then under questioning, he seems to give up.  King Fate sums up my thoughts pretty well:

Even further down, FoS ArkZero.

The vote-and-run on Hatmoza bothers me, as does stuff like this:

Bad reason to vote

The thing is nobody was trying to control the game, zex and WoW were stating what they thought with a "strong" tone of voice, that's all, they didn't make anyone vote for somebody, they didn't threat, nothing. You (with the sfb and nen) are making/made a huge deal of something that only 2 players (from 26) did.

Changing your vote to shut them up and the regreting and get back where you started didn't help either.

Nobody can deal with sabby like you

If that's the case then, he will just make things easier.

EDIT - This is looking pretty good for a double lynch lol

@Falcon

Regarding the 'missing list': It is a way to actually quantify lurkers. It prevents false accusations.

Regarding the 'action list': Doesn't seem too useful yet, but when we get more role confirmations, and more days data, I have a feeling that things are going to start popping out as odd.

Just to be clear, it is 50% + 1 to lynch right? I think I miscounted earlier, but it looks like 18 players, so 10 votes to lynch.

Sabby is currently at 7.

Zexen is currently at 6.

@theRepublic

#3 - I was just explaining what I did. Number 1 and 2 were the reasons I voted you.

I stated my suspicions on Trangent, SciFiBoy and theRepublic. No one seems to care and Sabby seems like a good choice [followed by KingFate]. The reasons to vote for him are written out in quite a few posts already. My statement was just a joke.

They were basically saying that anyone who votes no lynch is not contributing to the game.  And that they would be looking scummy if they didnt put effort into finding someone to lynch.   SO they were basically saying vote for someone, or else.............   So yes, in a sense they were trying to control my vote, with a threat.   I suggest you go back and reread the thread if you didnt see that.

If you don't mind could you please link those?

I saw that, and I still can't understand how you were afraid enough to change your vote, you're talking like if they controled the town and we were gonna do whatever they wanted. When that happened it was 2 players against 4 players from a total of 24, yes they are influential players but still unless you're afraid of gather their attention or you didn't think the no lynch was the best idea, I don't see how could you be so easily manipulated by them.