What I wanted you to read was where he said that MS paid more than 50 million for FF13 and that Halo 3 and ODST's scores were bribed for.
The whole discussion is here

If you read the post after that one I said that the 50 million amount was to be disregarded as I do not know how much Microsoft payed for FFXIII to go multiplat, it was probably even more than 50 million dollars.

I do strongly believe some reviewers were bribed for Halo 3 and most definately with ODST. Isn't it funny how all the big name reviewers IGN, Gamespot, etc gave the game at least an 8 or a 9 and the lesser known ones gave it a 7 at the most? It was overpriced DLC, nothing more!

and you can see Metacritic if you do not believe me along with countless videos on Youtube from 360 owners who have come out and told the truth about ODST and how disappointing it really is, people just like you who own a 360.

here i found the link. http://neogaf.net/forum/showpost.php?p=18269957&postcount=75

The playstation brand only has 264 million in profits left since 1998 as of Q2 2010 financial period, the rest have been erased.

edit: that's 4.7 billion in losses which can pretty much only be from the PS3.  The real number is probably much larger, the ps2 and psp have been offsetting losses the whole time. 

I haven't seen anything to the like of those statements. I've seen "all of ps2 and a good portion of ps1", but not that. If he is right, he is right, but if he is the one with the missing information then he should provide those. I'm not going to sift through the internet looking for his "fact".

That graph is missing 4 years of data.

Additionally, this only covers the gaming division and not the subsequent company branches that profited off of the playstation brand.

Look at the Microsoft part of the graph...I lol'd seriously

there is no graph with further data.  That's why i said since 1998. 

You have no proof MS even paid Square to go multiplat...so that point is dead.

If your complaining about an "over-priced DLC's" score than why arent you argueing about an re-release of a ps2 games score (GOW:Collection)?...........another point dead.

You "believe " that halo 3's score was bribed for you know what that means? Its your own opinion that it was bribed for and no facts correlates with your opinion soo........how many more points do I have to kill before you realize you are dead wrong?

I was looking for the numbers but johnsobas beat me to it. Notice how from 2004 the profit decreases and on ps3 launch year  it was not even 70 million, after that it's huge losses.

What made the profits smaller? In years 2004-2006 it was rd that was chunking at the profits, what else? The ps2 was very strong in 2004 up till 2006 when production of the ps3 sent the whole thing to hell, later it's pure massacre with 2 years of over 1 billion $ losses.

Isn't this exactly what you wanted us to show? We gave you solid proof that the PS3 was eating up ps2 and a bit of ps1 profits, not anything else.

Unless you wanted proof that the ps3 was eating up all the profit that Sony is making, i'll answer that one, no it was not. Not a chance in hell for that one.

My point still stands though, you got your proof, right?