By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Rockstar promises big things to PS3 owners in 2010

Tridrakious on 21 January 2010

SMUGGLER'S RUN HD CONFIRM!!!!!



Around the Network
disolitude on 21 January 2010

Financially it doesnt make any sense to go anything PS3 exclusive, unless Sony is paying for it like MS did with GTA4 DLC... Same with 360 exclusive...those two need each other at this point.

But Im sure Rockstar are a bunch of smart people who know what they are doing behind closed doors.



edds73 on 22 January 2010

GTA5 ps3 exclusive would be huge, but it will never happen, I can see Agent being shown/demo at E3 with a 2010 release date, and LA noir still being a ps3 exclusive (maybe timed).



Garnett on 22 January 2010

GTA SA Remake. Im calling it.

Not a full remake but an HD remake like GoW but the PC version on max graphics in 1080p at 60 fps. That would be fucking awesome. Id buy it.



*Remember when the world was supposed to end on May 21st, 2011? Well click here to see our short parody video of it [not]ending*

slowmo on 22 January 2010
forevercloud3000 said:
themanwithnoname said:
Carl2291 said:
c0rd said:
Carl2291 said:
Heh.

GTA5... Would cause some major meltdowns.

I could understand why they would go PS3 exclusive... But i could also understand the risk in doing so.

Reason being... paid hundreds of millions by Sony?

Risk... cutting off the majority of their fans, making future releases suffer?

Yes. And not having the limits of DVD to worry about.

Yes. And making it a possible "flop" in terms of GTA sales.


All of their releases last gen were well received, so I don't see how the "limits of DVD" is a legitimate line of reasoning here.

last gen was last gen. DVD is becoming more and more obsolete everyday. With the heavy push for games to look better and more and more content on the discs, DVD is cripling games this gen. Its the equivilant of putting PS2 level graphics on a PS1 CD. Yea, you can do it, but it hinders just how much of it you can do.

No, the biggest crippling factor in games is the cost of developing games the size of last gen has increased dramatically, not the media they're on.  Gears 2 was huge and looked amazing, surprise it fits on one DVD.  If the 360 had Bluray, developers would still be struggling to fit stuff onto a disk, when you give developers more capacity they'll get lazy and fill it, thats fact!



Around the Network
forevercloud3000 on 22 January 2010
slowmo said:
forevercloud3000 said:
themanwithnoname said:
Carl2291 said:
c0rd said:
Carl2291 said:
Heh.

GTA5... Would cause some major meltdowns.

I could understand why they would go PS3 exclusive... But i could also understand the risk in doing so.

Reason being... paid hundreds of millions by Sony?

Risk... cutting off the majority of their fans, making future releases suffer?

Yes. And not having the limits of DVD to worry about.

Yes. And making it a possible "flop" in terms of GTA sales.


All of their releases last gen were well received, so I don't see how the "limits of DVD" is a legitimate line of reasoning here.

last gen was last gen. DVD is becoming more and more obsolete everyday. With the heavy push for games to look better and more and more content on the discs, DVD is cripling games this gen. Its the equivilant of putting PS2 level graphics on a PS1 CD. Yea, you can do it, but it hinders just how much of it you can do.

No, the biggest crippling factor in games is the cost of developing games the size of last gen has increased dramatically, not the media they're on.  Gears 2 was huge and looked amazing, surprise it fits on one DVD.  If the 360 had Bluray, developers would still be struggling to fit stuff onto a disk, when you give developers more capacity they'll get lazy and fill it, thats fact!

There was nothing huge about Gears 2 except the armor from what I hear. Most ppl were complaining of short campain (4-7hrs) or so just like they do with most shooters. Have you not realized that games are getting shorter and shorter and concentrate more and more on Multiplayer? RPGs barely clock in 60hrs(30 for WRPGs) these days, let alone the 300hrs I could put into a PS1 or 2 RPG.

We are getting less and less content for prettier, shinier graphics, fact. Don't even get me started on this DLC kick/ high way robery (cough*Capcom*cough).



      

      

      

Greatness Awaits

PSN:Forevercloud (looking for Soul Sacrifice Partners!!!)

Garnett on 22 January 2010
forevercloud3000 said:
slowmo said:
forevercloud3000 said:
themanwithnoname said:
Carl2291 said:
c0rd said:
Carl2291 said:
Heh.

GTA5... Would cause some major meltdowns.

I could understand why they would go PS3 exclusive... But i could also understand the risk in doing so.

Reason being... paid hundreds of millions by Sony?

Risk... cutting off the majority of their fans, making future releases suffer?

Yes. And not having the limits of DVD to worry about.

Yes. And making it a possible "flop" in terms of GTA sales.


All of their releases last gen were well received, so I don't see how the "limits of DVD" is a legitimate line of reasoning here.

last gen was last gen. DVD is becoming more and more obsolete everyday. With the heavy push for games to look better and more and more content on the discs, DVD is cripling games this gen. Its the equivilant of putting PS2 level graphics on a PS1 CD. Yea, you can do it, but it hinders just how much of it you can do.

No, the biggest crippling factor in games is the cost of developing games the size of last gen has increased dramatically, not the media they're on.  Gears 2 was huge and looked amazing, surprise it fits on one DVD.  If the 360 had Bluray, developers would still be struggling to fit stuff onto a disk, when you give developers more capacity they'll get lazy and fill it, thats fact!

There was nothing huge about Gears 2 except the armor from what I hear. Most ppl were complaining of short campain (4-7hrs) or so just like they do with most shooters. Have you not realized that games are getting shorter and shorter and concentrate more and more on Multiplayer? RPGs barely clock in 60hrs(30 for WRPGs) these days, let alone the 300hrs I could put into a PS1 or 2 RPG.

We are getting less and less content for prettier, shinier graphics, fact. Don't even get me started on this DLC kick/ high way robery (cough*Capcom*cough).

Time change man, Few people like to play the same game for 100 hours. Multiplayer is quickly becoming the new SP if you think about it. More people play MP, MP even has Ranks and stats like SP games have. 

 

Think if in DragonBall Z Gohan took 50 Episodes to kill Cell, After he went SS2.  People would stop watching,Why? Its boring. RPG shouldn't be a virtual world where we live they should be entertaining and fun to play then we put them down and get back to our world.



*Remember when the world was supposed to end on May 21st, 2011? Well click here to see our short parody video of it [not]ending*

Porcupine_I on 22 January 2010

well, i might be a bit too realistic thinking here, but he only said he understands the frustration about not being able to play DLC and that they will be good to PS3 owners this year.

but that doesn't mean they WON'T be that good to any other console.

This could simply mean there won't be any more exclusive DLC for Rockstar Games this year like Red Dead Redemption.

well, there is still Agent, though



“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

- George Orwell, ‘1984’

Ghazi4 on 22 January 2010

i think rockstar miss the ps2 days when they used to sell like hotcakes lol soo they want their momentum again!!! GO PS3 AND ROCKSTAR!!! ill buy 5 copies of agent so u can trust us ps3 owners that we BUY GAMES!!! lol




Get your Portable ID!

Lurker on 22 January 2010
kowenicki said:
Carl2291 said:
Heh.

GTA5... Would cause some major meltdowns.

I could understand why they would go PS3 exclusive... But i could also understand the risk in doing so.


really? can you explain the logic of that move to me?

Maybe they don't care about the money. Maybe they just want to make the biggest game possible and take a huge leap. All we know is that they do not want to make a multi-disc GTA. If they did a PS3/PC GTA nothing would be held back.