It would take just as much time and effort to answer me properly, I mean seriously... why is it so hard to converse with you?

L.O.L.
HELL NO.
If 3.0 gets a good redesign over this mess though Id gladly become much more active in the forums. Free hits man.

As for the membership cost I see no problems with it. It was nice enough to get all of this stuff for free and as long as I can browse to a game and see what it's total sales are (Can I still do this? Will it still show total sales on the game pages?) I will be happy.

I probably won't pay for it though since the removal of ads isn't included as of now, which is a big minus for me if I am paying a cost. No ads if one of the main reasons I have brought up the request of a subscription plan plenty of times before.

Either way I won't be going anywhere and I wish you guys all the best with this new venture.


By the way, will those with memberships be given a private forum area? I don't know if this was mentioned yet. I ask because this would give them a way to talk about the numbers info they are granted without making it viewable to non subscription members of the site.

I am not sure I value the data that much. If it gets too expensive, I will have to table following this as much as I have done in the past. I may pop in for general chat. But, will likely try to drop out of biz talk and focus far more on my non-profit work.

Coming soon to a TV near you... chess. Message me for details (like tell me HOW we can get chess on TV ).

However, I do respect Brett trying to do this, and him being able to make money doing this.

Please tell me where I'm having an "attitude".

And thank you for your clear answer. I wish you'd give answers like this more often.

The problem is that many of your posts are quite ambigious. I think it would help if you provided more clear replies.

I think ioi needs a hug. Seriously, I would have flipped out by now if I was ioi (but then again, that's me).

Chrizum, if you want more access to the data, you could consider becoming a contributor. Of course, that would require helping out the site, and I guess that's just too much to ask.

Wait.

If I came across as wanting to acces the data, you interpreted me wrong. I was merely trying to get a clear answer to your question, which I got.

Then there's really nothing else to discuss here. Why are you still arguing?

Well, I'm kinda sad because I like to use the filters in the Weekly Charts. But I'd gladly exchange that feature for more accurate numbers, specially in the software department.

I may pay for the Standard subscription, but I'd like if we can pay it monthly and not annually.