ps3_jrpg_gamer said:
vlad321 said:
ps3_jrpg_gamer said:
dobby985 said:
ps3_jrpg_gamer said: dual-analog is way superior over mouse and keyboard so ps3 defenetily |
o_O
|
why you are so impressed a lot of people belive this and me i left gaming on PC years ago because i don 't like keyboard and mouse
|
Because saying that is like saying that Wii graphics are way superior over HD graphics.
|
sorry but we have different beliefs analog stick is better in camera control and so in movement if a play a game on PC i won 't even move my char
|
First person perspective kind of eliminates the need for camera control since there's technically no camera. You see through your eyes instead of staring at some object or figure you control. In FPS games, PC controls are vastly superior if only for response speed, sensitivity and overall fluid motion. If you set up a match with the best console players versus the best PC players in any FPS game, the PC players would win easily simply because of controls (you'd turn of aim assist of course, a feature that removes most of the point of an FPS).
Chairman-Mao; damn right its tougher, just like its tougher to beat a formula one car with a regular car or win an NBA match with a team of toddlers in diapers; it is inferior. Auto-aim is the biggest piece of crap ever to grace FPS games, the object in the game is to aim and shoot, if you have an AI interfere with aiming you might as well have an AI shoot for you and simply do the walking. Sounds fun. I know a lot of people don't like mouse and keyboard but that does nothing to change that it is in fact a better way of controlling a game character in a first person view.
Seriously, aim-assist in shooters, driving assist in the form of AI's braking for you at a set line. What's next? A platform game that plays for you? Oh, wait... Seriously though, what's the appeal of these games if you remove the essence of what they are? To me it seems like removing the instruments from a song, its still music but its just not the same any more.