c03n3nj0 said: Well, I'll go ahead and change it now. Vote - Sabby       If you go read some of the reasons, we already stated why we are suspicious of you. And then you posted here and there ignored a lot of it until now. It'a kinda bothering me. And I'm not suspicious of you FoSing a bunch of people, that doesn't mean much to me, it's just the way you've been acting in the posts.

I'm actually acting quite normal. Check past games.

@nordlead

sorry for confusing you ...

 

Vote: dsister44

you are lying, or at least that's how I see it.

hatmoza said: @nordlead sorry for confusing you ...   Vote: dsister44 you are lying, or at least that's how I see it.

Please! Point out where I am lying 

@sabby: Asking people to check past games is one of the worst defense you can provide.

1. Nobody will read through an entire game to see what your "normal" behavior is.
2. Even if someone did, they'd have to read more than one game to see a pattern in your behavior.
3. Each new game resets everything, you could be acting "normal" to blend in.

Quit dodging accusations and answer in a straightforward manner!

sabby_e17 said: c03n3nj0 said: Well, I'll go ahead and change it now. Vote - Sabby If you go read some of the reasons, we already stated why we are suspicious of you. And then you posted here and there ignored a lot of it until now. It'a kinda bothering me. And I'm not suspicious of you FoSing a bunch of people, that doesn't mean much to me, it's just the way you've been acting in the posts. I'm actually acting quite normal. Check past games.

So 'normal' for you is acting suspiciously?  If that is the case, then you are just making it harder to find the real mafia.  My vote stands.

TruckOSaurus said: @sabby: Asking people to check past games is one of the worst defense you can provide. 1. Nobody will read through an entire game to see what your "normal" behavior is. 2. Even if someone did, they'd have to read more than one game to see a pattern in your behavior. 3. Each new game resets everything, you could be acting "normal" to blend in. Quit dodging accusations and answer in a straightforward manner!

OK.

@therepublic:

I want you to quote every single piece of info that makes me look suspicious and I'll explain step by step.

Because firstly I need to know what post is it that makes me look guilty.

I still wouldn't mind lynching one of dsister--dtewi--MM476 because if one turns up guilty I'd want to lynch the rest. But sabby does seem like today's prime suspect. I have to go but I'll probly vote after I get back.

Vote: Sabby

If there's an investigative role in this game, please scan the person that seemed to have a good eye for suspicious activity. If nothing's posted Day3, I'm gonna assume that person's clean.

sabby_e17 said: @therepublic: I want you to quote every single piece of info that makes me look suspicious and I'll explain step by step. Because firstly I need to know what post is it that makes me look guilty.

First there was the FoS of Dsister right after Final-Fan.  Read in context with the thread, it makes it look like you agree with Final-Fan's reasoning since you give none of your own.  However, Final-Fan's reasoning included you!  I have asked for a reason several times already, and it seems you don't have one other than 'I have a bad feeling about him'.  That is shady.

Commenting on the long night?  Did you have something to do with that perhaps?  Why did it look like it would be another long day?  I didn't see anything that would indicate that.  Do you know something I don't?  As Nordlead pointed out, why are you commenting on the cop so early in the game?As j0 already pointed out, this seems like you trying to lie low.  Quite a few short posts from you with little to no substance.Here, you do not have a reason for your action, and then leave so you don't have to explain further.  Again, another short post with little substance.This seems like a not-so-veiled threat against Vetteman.  There is zero reason for a protown person to make a threat like this.  It only casts suspicion on the threat giver, and protown roles generally aren't able to carry out threats anyway (although it has become apparent that there are several special roles out there, so maybe you can carry out this threat even if you are protown).

Again, I think that acting strangely and throwing FoSs' everywhere give the mafia an easier time to hide.  As scum, FoSing everywhere also gives you more opportunity to just follow the bandwagon when it comes around.  You can say 'I had so many suspects I wasn't sure what to do' when a lynch gets a protown, and 'I knew he was scum' when a lynch gets mafia.  You have been quick to jump on a lot of options this game as well.  You FoSed Truck right after (30 min later) Dsister did, you FoSed Dsister right after (30 min later) Final-Fan did, you said you would 'keep an eye on Dtewi' right after (2 posts later) Final-Fan thought the same thing, and then you hopped on the Dsister bandwagon with a vote after my big post where I FoSed both of you.  Part of that last action seems to be in line with you keeping your options open, and part of it also seems to be a way to distance yourself from Dsister (although a protown role would also be trying to do the same a this point to try and survive)(also, with Dsister's role claim, I am less suspicious of him, so seeming to be aligned with Dsister is no longer as bad as it was before).

There, I think that is a pretty good summation as to why I think you are suspicious.

Final-Fan said: I still wouldn't mind lynching one of dsister--dtewi--MM476 because if one turns up guilty I'd want to lynch the rest. But sabby does seem like today's prime suspect. I have to go but I'll probly vote after I get back.

I think I missed something.  Why are you linking those three people?