TRios_Zen said:
Mass Effect is a great series, but it isn't a Gears of War/Halo type of exclusive, so I have absolutely no problem with them porting the game to the PS3. If you are a PS3 only owner I hope you have the opportunity to play it, I've played through the first twice and enjoyed it both times. My argument has never been PS3 owners shouldn't have access to either of these games. @kitler53, outside of Game of The Year discs (with DLC included) how often are current generation games included completely free? By your logic, since I'm a new PS3 owner, if I want MGS or Resistance 2, them being old and all, I can just wait for the next game to come and I shoud get both for $60, right? Come on! That's silly and you know it.
|
No, by Kitler's logic, you'd get Resistance 2+Resistance 3 for $60 if you waited until ~6 months after Resistance 3 launched. If Mass Effect 1+2 comes out for PS3 in Summer/Holidays 2010 for $60, at that stage it will be about $60 for both games on 360 as well. The reason you paid more for it ($60 per game) is because you wanted it sooner, which you obviously have to pay more for. Otherwise, why not complain that ME is cheaper now than when it launched? The reason it is cheaper is because people sacrificed having it now in order to save money. That is what PS3 gamers would need to do.












