By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TRios_Zen on 16 December 2009
Edit Thread
Dno said:
TRios_Zen said:

Mass Effect is a great series, but it isn't a Gears of War/Halo type of exclusive, so I have absolutely no problem with them porting the game to the PS3.  If you are a PS3 only owner I hope you have the opportunity to play it, I've played through the first twice and enjoyed it both times.  My argument has never been PS3 owners shouldn't have access to either of these games.

@kitler53, outside of Game of The Year discs (with DLC included) how often are current generation games included completely free?

By your logic, since I'm a new PS3 owner, if I want MGS or Resistance 2, them being old and all, I can just wait for the next game to come and I shoud get both for $60, right?  Come on!  That's silly and you know it.

 


They bundle a lot of games that dropped this gen for free... hell i got lego batman and pure on one disk for free with a xbox bundle. and also

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/93813-Capcom-Bundles-Three-Platinum-Hits-for-360 

thats 3 games that was 60 bucks each for 40 bucks!!!!!

your being silly to think that 2 years after a game has dropped that people will pay full price for it.

its clear that ps3 owners are not getting ME2 on release date ,so then they will release mab a 3 year old game at the time (mass effect) and a one year old game if it comes out in 2011 (which i think it will).

Should retail for no more then 60 bucks (30 for each) .

 

So bundling free games WITH A CONSOLE, is the same as doing so with a game?  OK.

You edited, your post, but I'll re-iterate, no where have I said that people should pay full price for a many year old game; but I have seen no precedent for a current gen game to be bundled free with the sequel.

That is my only argument, I'm not sure why you think that is SO outlandish.