By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - The Malstrom thread

LordTheNightKnight said:

Out of the three current major home consoles plus PlayStation 2, console spending by movie game buyers was highest on the PlayStation 3, Nielsen found in a recent study, with that group spending 17 percent over average. Xbox 360 owners, by contrast, were essentially average, measuring only 1 percent above the index; PlayStation 2 owners were similar, only 4 percent above.

Perhaps most surprisingly, the correlation between licensed game buying and platform spending was lowest on the Wii — that group spent 6 percent less than the index.

I know the point of this thread was to keep all the Malstrom stuff in one thread, but this little bit is probably deserving of its own thread.

This pretty much is a direct contradiction to most of the "common knowledge" floating around on this forum.



Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic

Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Mobile - Yugioh Duel Links (2017)
Mobile - Super Mario Run (2017)
PC - Borderlands 2 (2012)
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)

Around the Network
theRepublic said:
LordTheNightKnight said:

Out of the three current major home consoles plus PlayStation 2, console spending by movie game buyers was highest on the PlayStation 3, Nielsen found in a recent study, with that group spending 17 percent over average. Xbox 360 owners, by contrast, were essentially average, measuring only 1 percent above the index; PlayStation 2 owners were similar, only 4 percent above.

Perhaps most surprisingly, the correlation between licensed game buying and platform spending was lowest on the Wii — that group spent 6 percent less than the index.

I know the point of this thread was to keep all the Malstrom stuff in one thread, but this little bit is probably deserving of its own thread.

This pretty much is a direct contradiction to most of the "common knowledge" floating around on this forum.

Make a thread based on his source, not him.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

LordTheNightKnight said:
theRepublic said:
LordTheNightKnight said:

Out of the three current major home consoles plus PlayStation 2, console spending by movie game buyers was highest on the PlayStation 3, Nielsen found in a recent study, with that group spending 17 percent over average. Xbox 360 owners, by contrast, were essentially average, measuring only 1 percent above the index; PlayStation 2 owners were similar, only 4 percent above.

Perhaps most surprisingly, the correlation between licensed game buying and platform spending was lowest on the Wii — that group spent 6 percent less than the index.

I know the point of this thread was to keep all the Malstrom stuff in one thread, but this little bit is probably deserving of its own thread.

This pretty much is a direct contradiction to most of the "common knowledge" floating around on this forum.

Make a thread based on his source, not him.

Do you want me to do it?



Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic

Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Mobile - Yugioh Duel Links (2017)
Mobile - Super Mario Run (2017)
PC - Borderlands 2 (2012)
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)

theRepublic said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
theRepublic said:
LordTheNightKnight said:

Out of the three current major home consoles plus PlayStation 2, console spending by movie game buyers was highest on the PlayStation 3, Nielsen found in a recent study, with that group spending 17 percent over average. Xbox 360 owners, by contrast, were essentially average, measuring only 1 percent above the index; PlayStation 2 owners were similar, only 4 percent above.

Perhaps most surprisingly, the correlation between licensed game buying and platform spending was lowest on the Wii — that group spent 6 percent less than the index.

I know the point of this thread was to keep all the Malstrom stuff in one thread, but this little bit is probably deserving of its own thread.

This pretty much is a direct contradiction to most of the "common knowledge" floating around on this forum.

Make a thread based on his source, not him.

Do you want me to do it?

Just put it in the gaming section, since it's a statistic about all the home consoles.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

LordTheNightKnight said:
theRepublic said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
theRepublic said:
LordTheNightKnight said:

Out of the three current major home consoles plus PlayStation 2, console spending by movie game buyers was highest on the PlayStation 3, Nielsen found in a recent study, with that group spending 17 percent over average. Xbox 360 owners, by contrast, were essentially average, measuring only 1 percent above the index; PlayStation 2 owners were similar, only 4 percent above.

Perhaps most surprisingly, the correlation between licensed game buying and platform spending was lowest on the Wii — that group spent 6 percent less than the index.

I know the point of this thread was to keep all the Malstrom stuff in one thread, but this little bit is probably deserving of its own thread.

This pretty much is a direct contradiction to most of the "common knowledge" floating around on this forum.

Make a thread based on his source, not him.

Do you want me to do it?

Just put it in the gaming section, since it's a statistic about all the home consoles.

Done.

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=95689



Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic

Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Mobile - Yugioh Duel Links (2017)
Mobile - Super Mario Run (2017)
PC - Borderlands 2 (2012)
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)

Around the Network

http://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com/2009/12/21/email-ign-strikes-again/

Ok, im just posting because i got my mail published A_A yipee!

I know its not a big deal, he didnt comment it or anything, but i had to say it

Does any of you agree with my opinion?



Nintendo is the best videogames company ever!

Malstrom was renown for being one of the few "analysts" who saw the Wii before it happened.

But probably the best way to describe it is that he has begun to believe his own press clippings. In other words, he got one thing (admittedly a big thing) right and now he thinks he knows everything. Sometimes he makes strong arguments, other times he makes nonsensical ones.

He is blinded by his devotion to 2D to realize that many people wanted SMG2 about a month after SMG because they had beaten the game and there was nothing else on the Wii at that time of that quality.

All of this leads to the problem associated with the Wii -- it is software. It is not Nintendo which has done all it can to encourage others to develop for its little white box of joy. But everyone expects Nintendo to produce all the good games for its systems -- while (a) not expecting the same of Sony and Microsoft and (b) declaring the (desired) domination of first-party software that a weakness of the Nintendo system.

In other words, someone always has something to say about Nintendo.

What Malestrom said at first was smart. Now it seems he is intent on becoming just another voice in the cacophony of clamorers.

Mike from Morgantown





      


I am Mario.


I like to jump around, and would lead a fairly serene and aimless existence if it weren't for my friends always getting into trouble. I love to help out, even when it puts me at risk. I seem to make friends with people who just can't stay out of trouble.

Wii Friend Code: 1624 6601 1126 1492

NNID: Mike_INTV

mike_intellivision said:
Malstrom was renown for being one of the few "analysts" who saw the Wii before it happened.

But probably the best way to describe it is that he has begun to believe his own press clippings. In other words, he got one thing (admittedly a big thing) right and now he thinks he knows everything. Sometimes he makes strong arguments, other times he makes nonsensical ones.

He is blinded by his devotion to 2D to realize that many people wanted SMG2 about a month after SMG because they had beaten the game and there was nothing else on the Wii at that time of that quality.

All of this leads to the problem associated with the Wii -- it is software. It is not Nintendo which has done all it can to encourage others to develop for its little white box of joy. But everyone expects Nintendo to produce all the good games for its systems -- while (a) not expecting the same of Sony and Microsoft and (b) declaring the (desired) domination of first-party software that a weakness of the Nintendo system.

In other words, someone always has something to say about Nintendo.

What Malestrom said at first was smart. Now it seems he is intent on becoming just another voice in the cacophony of clamorers.

Mike from Morgantown



I admit he's full of himself at times, but you could at least elaborate here. It just seems like a general dismissal, not actually giving a critique.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

In what sense is that wrong? i know at least 10 people who hated 3D Mario and jumped at 2D Mario when they saw it, and it isnt only 10 people, 2D Mario is huge, NSMBW already outsold MG i Japan, and its probably going to outsell it worldwide before february

Malstrom says, people dont wanted 3D Mario as much as Nintendo thought, according to Nintendo (and the industry) 3D is the futue, and releasing 2D games its suicidal as people wont get an archaic game, but THEN NSMB came out on the DS, and started selling like hotcakes (remember it also outsold M64 remakepretty quickly) and now the Wii version is doing the same thing, the result: the industry is bashing Nintendo again

I dont see how Malstrom´s logic is flawed, when he has numbers behind it, who cares if there are 5 million of people waiting for SMG2, there are 20million people who are willing to buy NSMBW



Nintendo is the best videogames company ever!

Email: Another exiled gamer anecdote

Sean,

I have to say I appreciate what you’re doing. Not that I agree with everything you say (I prefer Puzzle Zelda to Arcade Zelda, but then Ocarina of Time was my first Zelda game), but it’s nice to see a real explanation for Nintendo’s dominance other than “people are stupid.”

Not that you need another anecdote about a previously-exiled gamer, but I thought I’d throw out a mention of my mother. We got an NES late in the game, around the end of ‘91 (I was six). We only ever had about 7 games for the thing, but I remember that my mother played most of them as much as we kids did. These were games like the SMB trilogy, Lolo 3, and Mickey Mousecapade. She was actually the first one of us to beat SMB 2 (the only one we had for a while.)

Obviously because of our late entry into videogaming, we ended up skipping the SNES, and when we eventually got an N64, my parents were no longer interested, until the Wii came along. The only console game my mother even touched before then was Mario Kart Double Dash (she plays Bejeweled-type games on the internet fairly often.). But Wii Sports she enjoyed, I suspect mostly because she could play it with her family. SMB 5, on the other hand, she loves. She hasn’t gone so far as to play it by herself yet, but she has actually initiated the “Let’s get everyone together to play,” which is a big change. This is in spite of the fact that her kids are clearly impatiently waiting or even leaving her behind while she gets killed frequently.

My dad has a similar story, although he was always more into PC gaming and wasn’t really much of an exile, just played fewer games as he got more busy. He loves Tiger Woods 10 so much that we’re getting him his own Wii for Christmas, as he complained about me taking my console back to school with me.

I should note that my parents played Traveler for a while back in their early-mid 20’s, so they may not be your typical example.

There has been this myth that the NES and that time period was the time for ‘hardcore gaming’ and nothing could be further from the truth. Your own family history had your parents play games with you at that time. However, as gaming veered away from what gaming is, your parents didn’t want to join you. Now that gaming is returning back to what gaming is supposed to be (not movies), it is no surprise your parents want to join you again.

Of course, your own family history and childhood memories are irrelevant to the dictates of books like “Casual Revolution” who declare that we have never seen such new ‘demographics’ before! I can excuse people for this ignorance if they were born after the 80s. But many of these analysts and other people were born well before.

There are templates everyone in the “Game Industry” gets in line behind. One of the obvious ones is “Nintendo is doomed!” because Nintendo is always doomed no matter what happens. Even when the Wii was sold out, stories were still being written how Nintendo was doomed.

But the other template is this: “The Game Industry is growing like never before! OMG!!!” Like the “Nintendo is doomed!” template, the “Game Industry growing like never before! OMG!!!!” is always followed even if the “Game Industry” is suffering decline. You will never, ever hear anyone talk about how the “new demographics” and “women” used to be part of gaming fifteen years ago and earlier. Writing that story would imply that the “Game Industry” did something wrong as it veered away from whatever it was doing before. If you notice, the “Game Industry” is always ‘growing’ even when it has declining numbers.

From the Industry: Reply to Dyack stuck in a cloud

Hey Sean,

I’ll send you a longer e-mail someday, as I think you have some
amazing things to say, but I just wanted to send a quick one about
Denis Dyack. As a former employee at Silicon Knights (and now
happily working elsewhere), I can confirm that Denis does not make
games. I am not even joking in the slightest when I say this is an
average itinerary for his day:

10 am: Arrive at work
10 am – 11 am: Watch movie trailers as loud as possible with his
office door open. I learned about more movies while working there than
I ever thought possible.
11 am – 1 pm: Lunch
1 pm – 3 pm: Play games in his office, again as loud as possible.
After a month of listening to Dawn of War 2, I could quote every
off-hand remark spoken in that game.
3 pm – 3:30 pm: Clean his sword. I wish I was joking.
3:30 pm – 4:30 pm: Google his own name to find out what people are
saying about him on message boards.
4:30 pm – 5 pm: Ignoring employees’ pleas for review of their work
(since he insists on sole sign-off privileges).

Honestly, Denis is completely separated from the process of making
games that it’s actually frightening. But it does explain some of the
things he says. By the way, given Denis’ habit of Googling himself, I
wouldn’t recommend posting this e-mail. But if you do, please let me
remain anonymous :).

Cheers,

Anonymous

P.S.: I love your posts about what you like in a game, especially
arcade-based gameplay and mythology. Those are the two most important
things to me when I’m designing games, but trust me when I say that
working in this industry has a way of beating that out of a person.
I’m glad to know people out there still appreciate it!

Cleaning his sword everyday!? How did you work there? You have to be a saint.

Dyack appears to be example supremo of the “I’m a genius designer! Look at me! Woo woo!”

You’re not the first developer to tell me you like the posts talking about gameplay and mythos and all. It is interesting that when those posts first appeared, I got hate mail from some people who just wanted this site to be about ‘business’. But I think what is going on inside the customer’s mind is very important, no paramount, to why some games sell forever.

Since people like those posts I’ll try to put out more!

Email: You can’t play with God so I don’t worship games

[...](A guy from ABC TV’s Good Game) knows people who will buy and play every new Mario game regardless of perceived quality simply because “it’s Mario.” (Yahtzee)responded – in retrospect, a little too hastily – with “yeah, it’s like talking to people who believe in God.”[...]

Yahtzee´s full editorial

I’ve read it, and I found it, well, totally predictable.

There’s a subtle difference between “believing in gaming”, like believing in mythology or religion, you can NOT play with (any) god, but you can play games.
Gamers don’t “believe” in gaming, at least there is no “blind faith” (also called hype)
There are still references to how Mario should stay in space floating and never returning back.

But Mario is not in deep space, far away from his fantasy world of faith in gaming, Mario is selling, very VERY near from him, in Australia, and everywhere else.

Mario is not a god, Miyamoto is not a god, japanese gamers didn’t buy Super Mario Galaxy, and since Super Mario World, the Mario Madness became “Sony Sanity” (ironic)
And now this Mario is selling again, and japanese people don’t believe in gaming, they play games.

Now there is some projectionism from our “hardcore” writer, he thinks Super Mario Bros 5 is FOR NEW AUDIENCES! LOL
And, he is quite sure, the only way to introduce Mario to new audiences is to make them buy the old ones full-price!

Nintendo did that on GBA, and was “quite” succesful, but then we must remember, Game Boy Advance was the ultimate example of sustaining the old GameBoy premises.

But the point is, calling Super Mario Bros 5 a ” Cultural Masturbation” is quite daring to say the least.
If Mario is a “cultural masturbation”, I am totally positively sure the “Hardcore” are just plain impotent.

You can’t go anywhere from space (Game Industry actual position)

I say to them, Mario went from space, back to the beginning, before entering the “Point of No Return”.
Meanwhile, the Industry (and their forum dwellers and viral marketers) as a whole is past the point of no return, being slowly swallowed by a black hole.

That’s the Event Horizon, as they reach it, the time will eventually stop for them and they will cease to exist.

Wow, Yahtzee has gone insane. It is really something how Mario 5 rattles these people off big time.

You’d think these ‘hardcore’ types would love old-school games like Mario 5 and be thrilled that the old-school can still sell. But that is just it, isn’t it? Maybe the ‘hardcore’ aren’t ‘old-school’ at all.

If you ask the ‘hardcore’ what an ‘old-school’ game is, they will mention something from the first PlayStation or N64 or Saturn. To them, games from the 16-bit, 8-bit, Atari Era and such are not ‘old-school’, they are just ‘primitive’ like stone age times. From their perspective, they see Mario 5 selling and think “Why is this stone age era game selling so well? Wow, people must be sooo stupid.”

Anyway, what is up with these guys bringing up religion from out of nowhere? You’ll see the emailer in the post above bring up religion as well.

Since fifteen to twenty years ago, I finally feel as if games are beginning to PROGRESS forward. Before, they kept playing with technology or diluting themselves with movie elements. Now after a decade or two of not going anywhere, it feels we are getting back to the revolution that is gaming.

Email: You ruined the Internet

Everyone is thinking whatever is good for business is good for them, I don’t get this logic, why do you attack opinions with business logic? I understand that some things should be viewed as business and not opinions and yet you bring up the whining, bitter hardcore gamers constantly, you’re just rubbing dirt in their wounds pretending the dog eat dog world is a good thing.

Hahaha, stupid hardcore gamers!

Hey, fuck you malstrom!

Why so offended? It’s just business.

The truth is the 3rd parties are doing everything right and still failing, no amazing game for casuals released for the console will sell unless it’s a Mario game. Nintendo is using the strategy of luck and fads, no true innovation is coming from them. The core market is stable, the casual market is stable, the glamorized nintendo market will rejoin the core. Are they going to release the Wii forever, actually, that’s a great strategy or do they really got those girls and grandmas hooked on strong enough for the Wii2? Maybe like a lot of 3rd party developers they’ll assume their consumer base is dumb enough for any of that. They are going to have to become a part of the core, make some fans and step in and stop the crap games for any of that.

The Wii will turn gaming into such a grey mush of mediocrity and the core consoles maybe if they actually accomplish anything will be beacon of light out of those peoples dark world. People will be totally wowed by the next generation of consoles in a way cheap motion sensing can’t do unless the Wii makes something with 360/PS3 graphics. I know, I know, graphics whores but NEVER underestimate pretty, shiny things.

There’s only so many magic tricks they can pull, I think motion sensing might be a strong feature in the future and more than a fad on any other console than the Wii, it’s a fad for Nintendo but I see it better used on other consoles. I’m saying is motion sensing is a great idea, Nintendo did it wrong and fooled people about it but what other good idea in theory will they fool people with? Motion sensing was not some simple novelty they pulled out their ass no better than any other, it was actually a good idea but it was just a perfect opportunity to get people in, I can’t believe there could be something as convincing as motion sensing made again. I can just imagine a future where Nintendo is dominant and then some cheap chinese console comes in and gives them a good fight,  that’s how toys work.

Also, please remove the religious undertones from your articles, you’re creating an internet Christianity and we don’t need another shitty religion.

I’m not even angry you, well I am.

You know what, all of gaming is dead, it will be a zombie corpse living forever in some insane backwards world of human fickleness picking the hottest fad of the month until when the internet is big enough and MMO’s will obliterate it , enjoy your horde of WoW players.

-
-
You ask why I use business logic so much? We don’t have a choice as all Industry news is about the “Industry”. No one talks about games anymore. The “Industry” chatting about itself in terms of sales, in terms of advertising, or whatever is business. Now, we have a choice. We can either use conjecture to help explain what is going on or we can use real business logic from real business books. I prefer to do the latter. If we are going to talk about business, then lets talk about business for real. We don’t need useless conjecture and bean counters. There is a reason why bean counters do not run companies.

You’re imagining the ‘religious undertones’. If this is about the ‘Handel’ Hallejulah vid, I was trying to make a cute comment about Mario 5 in Japan with Christmas spirit type music. In Star Control 2, the Pkunk go ‘hallejulah’ when their ship magically re-appears, and I don’t think anyone thinks that is a devious “religious undertone”.

And no, Core Gaming is not stable. It is in big trouble. This is why the Core Gaming companies, like Take 2, are drowning in red ink. If Core Gaming was doing so well, it would be growing in numbers of gamers (it isn’t) and it would be growing financially (it is in the red).

Japanese companies tend not to do ‘fads’. Unlike their western counterparts, Japanese companies tend to look at things in a more long term view. This is why Sony made a “future proof” PS3. Nintendo truly believes gaming is in decline which is why they are taking the odd steps they did with the DS and Wii.

Why isn’t the DS a fad like the Wii is? The Wii and DS are very similar after all. I’m amazed how the DS enters some sort of ‘void’ when it comes time to talk about how the Wii is ‘doomed’.

The Wii ‘fad’ was supposed to end in 2007. It didn’t. It was supposed to end in 2008. It didn’t. It was supposed to end in 2009. It didn’t. If 2007, 2008, and 2009 didn’t have the Wii doomed, then why think 2010, 2011, and 2012 are going to be any different?

You know what you need. You need Wii Relax, the coolest video game to come out. In it, you insert your finger into a device, like this:


Above: The Future of Gaming

Wii Relax is exactly what you need, emailer. With Wii Relax, you will not be aggravated as much. You will smile more. You will enjoy life.

My only peeve about Wii Relax is that Nintendo finally designed a game for the hardcore in mind. Will the hardcore appreciate this game being made just for them? No. They’ll probably declare it the End of Gaming Version 3.0.

(Already mentioned, but this is the full text.)

Email: IGN strikes again

http://wii.ign.com/articles/105/1056225p3.html

Ok, no bias against the Wii this time, i just found hilarious how that article seems to be meant to contradict you in every point, according to IGN the Orchestra, The Open World, and the Incredible intro made the first game great and they want more of that back on the sequel (shame on them)

I hated the orchestra no offense, but the MIDI are a thousand times more catchy

The intro completely ruined the game experience the first time i played, at least for me, i felt like i was playing one of those Mario clones that came out right after M64, trying to make things look cool when they dont

Bigger worlds? really, i really prefer the short arcade like leves that MG does have, everything concerning frustrating exploration trough repetitive enviroments should die

PD: I love Mario 5 i thought i liked MG until i played Mario 5 now i cant look at 3D Mario in the same way (shame on him)

You declare your preference of midi over orchestra music? Just posting your email alone will rattle people.

(About the article that gave us the "new" definition of "core" games.)

Email: The Hardcore and Sony’s Situation

Something that has puzzled me ever since I started reading your blog is how the hardcore always predict the fall of the Wii. I’ve heard all kinds of things:

“The fad is dying.” (I actually saw this very recently! People still believe it’s a fad!)

“Nintendo needs to release Wii HD to compete.”

“Sales are down, OMG! Nintendo is dying!” (Or in this case, Nintendo is responsible for the decline of the market)

And something that always puzzles me, is this:

What about Sony?

The hardcore love to compare the Wii to the PS3 and 360, their third party libraries in particular, yet no-one mentions anything about Sony’s blunder with the PS3 (only here have I seen it being brought up). As I mentioned in my email asking about innovation, I’ve seen how the hardcore can twist and turn arguments to make it sound like Nintendo is doomed all the time, and the PS3 is always on the rise. Always.

Yet it amazes me all the time whenever someone starts talking about the “demise” of Wii. The worst part is, no-one ever attributes this to Wii Music, or Animal Crossing. No-one ever mentions the word ‘momentum’. Instead, they say that “Nintendo is lazy”. Why on earth do we not see an article that says “Sony is stupid”? Why do we not see an article saying “Sony is Losing Profits”?

But no, the closest thing we get is the Kotaku post up there. And what does it say? “Sony is losing money but not as much as last year!” Or even better, “Next year will be Sony’s year! NEXT YEAR!” 2010 also happens to be the so-called “Wii HD” year. Isn’t that funny.

I am so sick and tired of seeing “casual” gaming being walked all over by these hardcore elitists who believe that gaming should be theirs entirely. I am sick of these gamers who believe that gaming should be about stories and immersion, and that arcade gameplay is a thing of the past. I’m sick of the gaming industry, and I’m suck of having to witness Nintendo being ridiculed and “doomed” while Sony and Microsoft get nothing but optimism and praise. I used to laugh at this, but now it just makes me tired to witness. Shouldn’t gamers have learned by now? Shouldn’t third parties have learned by now? Is it all a plot to bring Nintendo down, or are gamers and developers really that stuck in their own egos that they cannot possibly see two feet ahead of what’s going on before them?

They are industry first, gamers second. People like you and me are gamers first, industry second if ever.

When given a choice to talk about the industry or gaming, they always choose industry. People in the industry are ‘gods’ while gamers are just ‘dirt’. What gamers think about a game doesn’t matter. What only matters is how the industry thinks about it.

They talk as if industry and gaming are one of the same. But they are not. They are correct when they keep screaming when a Wii Sports or Wii Fit appears that it is “destroying gaming!” Since they perceive gaming to be the “industry”, they are absolutely correct that those Wii products are disrupting the industry.

I, myself, am a gamer the Industry cannot sell to and does not wish to sell to. I never participate in the hype. Gamers like myself cannot be easily manipulated. The Wii’s disruption is bringing in tons of people like me who cannot be manipulated or brainwashed by the ‘industry’.

The shouts that the Expanded Audience are buying trash is projection. It is the Core Gamers that have been brainwashed into buying trash. The Expanded Audience has higher standards which is why the Industry has so many problems with them. The “Casual Game Industry” for the Wii has collapsed which confirms the Expanded Audience demands quality, not the same old industry rot that they think they can peddle. The Expanded Audience just have a more sophisticated taste in games than the Core Gamers do. The Expanded Audience won’t put up with much bullshit.

Noticing this high sophistication and savvy tastes of the Expanded Audience, I have asked myself why this is. The answer is very simple. The Expanded Audience are the Exiled Old School Gamers. There is a reason why they are responding to games like Wii Sports and Mario 5 so strongly. What the Wii is doing today is what the Atari and NES did decades ago.

Believe it or not, things were much worse for Nintendo during the NES time. Nintendo was included with the Japanese bashing of the time. The US Congress was against Nintendo and would use the company as a political football to kick around. Worse, Atari was a sore loser and tied Nintendo up in the courts.

What is similar to that era and this one is that every year of the NES had analysts declare it to be Nintendo’s last good year. What is also similar is that third party companies resisted putting games on it such as Trip Hawkins of Electronic Arts did.

You shouldn’t get mad at any of this. You should laugh. This industry is in the midst of a long term meltdown. Instead of getting angry at, say, news pieces that Bloomberg writes on how Nintendo is destroying the game industry, you should laugh at them because they are genuinely funny. In one, Bloomberg would quote an analyst on the performance of Nintendo which the analyst responded, “Nintendo is doomed!” on cue and then quoted Microsoft on Microsoft’s performance, “Microsoft is doing fantastic!” Microsoft would respond. Apparently noticing this criticism, next story by the same writer has Bloomberg quote Reggie at length but still writes the story as “Nintendo is doomed!” Unfortunately, the beginning of the story where it says Nintendo’s lead over rivals is shrinking as its sales are not as good as last year shows that the writer does not understand math. If a console is still outselling its rivals, then the lead grows, not decreases.

Kotaku is funny because years ago, they got an analyst to specifically say that the new gamers coming in to DS and Wii cannot possibly use games like Brain Age or Wii Sports as ‘gateway drugs’ to lead to other games. Oh, and that DS and Wii aren’t going to be around too much longer. What do we learn?

An analyst quote in the present is “news”. An analyst quote from the past ends up becoming “absurdity”. It looks like these ‘analysts’ will pretty much say anything to suck up to some company or to the industry in general.

In the Kotaku one you linked to, the analyst declares that Core Gaming is doing good because Xbox 360 and PS3 games are up while Wii games are down. Yet, Wii games still dominate. Core Gaming is doing ’so well’ that core gaming companies are laying people off and drowning in red ink. If Core Gaming keeps doing this well, they will do a Kefka and make a monument to non-existence.

If the so-called ‘casual crowd’ is going away, then why is the DS doing so well? The DS relies very much on the ‘casual crowd’. The analyst intentionally does not mention the DS even though it is included with all the NPD data next to the other consoles.

If you were from Mars, you would think by the news stories that Nintendo is about to go third party.

“It is because the Industry hates Nintendo!”

But note that the hostility actually isn’t so much against Nintendo as it is against the Expanded Audience.

“Well, they don’t like how grandmas and housewives are coming to change their games.”

But that isn’t it either. Games like Mario 5, which is the sequel to the epitome of old school game: classic platform Mario is receiving much hostility. So it clearly isn’t grandmas and housewives they hate.

The “Game Industry”, as we have come to know it, is in the midst of cracking up. If it wasn’t, these pundits wouldn’t be acting so hurt and angry.

Reader, you and I should have a drink over the rubble of the Industry. We will toast the classic games that allowed the Industry to exist. And then we will toast the classic games that have not been made yet. And then, finally, we will toast the gamers which is something the “Industry” never did.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs