reask said:
MontanaHatchet said:
reask said: So had you gta 2 and 1? What I mean is they are now at home on 360 with dlc and everything.
When is Halo coming to PS3? Will it be 4 or 5? Know what I am saying now. Depending on your outlook you take different things out of different statements. Isnt there a mgs game coming to 360? |
There were early GTA games on the PC and Gameboy, as well as Tomb Raider games on the PC.
You're not going to win this argument, because you're defending a publication consisting of people who generally don't understand videogames.
When is God of War coming to the 360?
Will it be 4 or 5?
Know what I am saying now.
Depending on your outlook you take different things out of different statements.
Isn't there a Tales/Star Ocean/Lost Planet/etc. game coming to the PS3?
|
And a FF coming to 360.
It is no secret that 360 moves much more software than PS3.
Just look at UC2 for instance.
Whats the figures so far about 1.3 million. - Actually it's at 1.85mill.
Look at the work ND put in to that game and yet ODST has sold way more already and it is only a glorified expansion pack if you were to believe some of the posters here. - Well, comparing the 360's BIGGEST franchise to one of PS3's newest franchises, yes it's still pretty big I now, doesn't quite make sense.Why not compare it to GT5:P?
A Bit hard to do that as it isnt out yet. :D
If you mean prolouge then yes it did well bu others have not.
Devs need sales and this gen the 360 is the one thats supplying them. - Besides Halo and Gears, what are these HUGE sellers on 360 that don't do just as well, considering userbases, on PS3?
So what was the differnce in sales of MW2 on each platform then.
Most multis sell way more on 360 even taking ub in to account.
What the Gurdian says is correct imo for more than that reason. - The article is full of major bias no matter how you choose to spin it. And it's towards Nintendo as well. It's basically a 360-pro artcile. Nothing wrong with that if the author in question is fairly sizing up all three, which isn't the case here at all.
Yes I do admit it was a pretty poorly written article.
I may seem to be hitting on the PS3 but since buying one I have to say it is a decent console but so far does not appear to blow the 360 away by a long margin.
I am half way through Drakes Fortune atm and think it is a good game but I do have issues with it such as aiming, cover, camera angles at times and some other things.
I remember folks on this site claiming it to be the second coming when it came out and I am going wow is this supposed to blow 360 out of the water.
KZ2 I have played the demo and will be picking it up pretty soon as I quite like the realism of the gun recoils.
I just kinda get what they are saying in there clumsy way really now that I have both.
The PS3 is good and Sony are shit hot as far as gaming goes but MS really picked up the ball this gen and Sony still have to realise that.
If I could ask a question to put this in prespective.
If the 360 had performed the way the PS3 performed in the earlier stages would this conversation be taking place?
Sony are the Hoover of the gaming world and anybody who does not realise that is a fool.
If Sony had of produced the PS3 with the same user base as the xbox it would be dead in the water long ago and anyone who thinks different is illusional imo.
What that story says is if you are in to gaming the 360 has produced the goods thus far and Sony are still trying to catch up.
- Yet according to many, the PS3 ran away with the year on the game front. Also, considering the PS3 is $100 more expensive, it outperforms the 360 many times over. The console has picked up steam and is doing well, and some people can't accept that.
If you read the first bit of this paragraph I aknowledge the PS3 as been a good solid console I just point out that it does in no way blow its nearest competitor out of the water.
|