rocketpig said: mrstickball said: ...And exactly how cold does a Xbox 360 need to be to be cool enough!?
To me, a 10* reduction is great. Not perfect, but definitely a great step in the right direction. |
It's an improvement but more needs to be done. BTW, I'm not faulting MS for the heat, it's a common problem in Power6-based computers. IBM just didn't do a good job of keeping power consumption reasonable with that architecture. |
It's interesting that you are blaming IBM for their Power line of CPUs when:
1. All three 'new' generation systems use some version of the PowerPC architecture for their CPU.
2. It's the GPU in the 360 that recently got an extra heat sink. It's made by ATI, not IBM. (The Wii also has an ATI graphics chip.)
3. It's the CPU that was recently shrunk down to 65nm in the 360. The GPU is the same old, hot chip it always has been.
Hmmm...
The Wii only needs about 18W. And the original PS3 doesn't have any heating problems and actually uses a bit more electricity than the old 360s. I'd place the blame squarely on MS and whoever else put all the components together. If the CPUs actually failed, then you could blame IBM. But this appears to be a design fault. They put two hot chips right next to each other and didn't provide an adequate cooling system. And now MS is paying the price for their error.
Numbers are like people. Torture them enough and you can get them to say anything you want.
VGChartz Resident Thread Killer