steverhcp02 said:
joeorc said:
SmokedHostage said:
In all honesty, it took a price cut, slim model, and a strong first party and third party exclusive line-up to put Sony in the position it is in now. Can we say the same things in 2011? 2013? With Final Fantasy and Gran Turismo out of the picture in that time, what will keep momentum high for Sony's it does everything box? Is this the PS3's golden year or will it just be bigger, better and more badass in years to come?
|
that's pretty subjective on what would you say = badass?
but I see it this generation would be extended, due mainly to the aspect of these system's being less and less static than the previous generation's and not just Sony's machine's look at Microsoft's and Nintendo's. all system's are network connected this time in one shape or form thus there is less of a static dynamic to hinder their progress for viability for future game, or entertainment in the future as there was for prev. system's. Not to say the older system's are not fun, just that they are more static than change to the system's overall function's.
many see the current system's as not just Game system's
if anything this generation is going to be longer than I think many people may think.
look at the Wii, helping the people with physical disabilities
Doctors use Wii games for rehab therapy
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2008-02-08-wii-rehabilitation_N.htm
|
I agree. The main reason is technology can start seeing diminishing returns on advancements. BD will likely be here fo rlonger than DVD because living rooms simply wont benefit from higher resolution in light of screen sizes and viewing distance.
Nintendo is in the best position here to come out swinging next gen because they can vastly improve on their tech from a visual standpoint as well a technological standpoint. Especially considering the rehab youve mentioned. There are so many things nintendo has opened up for themselves for their next console.
MSFT is trying something with natal, the reason theyre trying to launch it as a "console" launch is because momentum cant simply gain based on the advancement and price required to go from where we went from xbox to 360 and PS2 to PS3.
Keeping momentum for the next 5-10 years will be about applications and innovation. We wont see visuals take a leap forward from MSFT and Sony, imo. MSFT is probably doing the right thing with natal, but imo, theyre really going all in with a tech that may need to be gradually introduced which may leave it DOA, we will see.
Sony with the wands is taking a pretty lame approach and it wont do anything significant for the console or its momentum imo, theyll need something else to sustain itself, but luckily for them they have BD, but in the same breath it leaves room for MSFT to add BD as a future momentum sustaining application.
The more i think about it, i know its slightly OT, but nintendo is sitting so pretty right now because they have so much room to grow with their next console.
From sonys standpoint their next move should be some type of DD system for retail games in which we are offered a lesser price, possibly $45 to $50 dollars for downloads and they need to spearhead a system for us to "unload" purchases internally through the PSN for trade ins for credit to download new software.
|
I think all three of the companies are all going to do well going forward from now on just because there is going to be so much overlap the only prob. is it will be exclusive's that will give each of the system's a unique feel to the system. that being Online component's of each system's which already we are seeing.
I have found each system to be Unique in it's own dynamic in the same market going forward, but on the same token most of the hardware being setup for growth for software application's of not just game's but for other Entertainment area's.
If anything this generation is going to be the direct building block for all future game system's do to the fact there is more stream's of revenue for each company than ever before in their game system's market.
these system's are Entertainment system's not just game system's
nintendo
microsoft
sony
all three have made a good strive toward their system's forward of "not just a game's machine"
the convergence of other aspect's of entertainment have made the IDEA of "just a game's machine" be obsolete
thus the strength of each system does not lie just in game's but on what other function's can the system do.
and as we go forward you will see more of that because the companies will need to do it.
look at cell phone's as a big example:
every cellphone being released anymore is being set to be a smart phone even when a device is not portable people are wanting devices to do more than a few thing's and the game market device is no exception.
but by doing so the companies extend the life of the device's viability on the market.
and that lead's to other problem's in of itself but that's the dynamic that these companies play in they know that so it's all good.
for the consumer that is, well most of the time it is