I just NSMBW is well above every other with the exception of SMB3, the DS Mario simply sucked compared to this, this game is brillianto and i know why reviewers cant even do a good review

Game reviews are based around very specific points

Gameplay
Sound
Graphics
Story

Mario 2D games simply dont have much of that, the gameplay is simple, the music is simple, the graphics are simple and the story is unexistant... the problem is... WHY ON EARTH CAN THEY REVIEW FUN, THATS WHAT REALLY MATHERS AND MARIO BEATS THE CRAP OUT OF ALMOST EVERY GAME ON THAT CATEGORY

I think it's because it would be unfair for big games like MW2 where they spent much more time on graphics, sound (sound score made by Hans Zimmer, they spent a lot...)

If Mario was rated for fun, this game had gotten about 95, which would be unfair for those big 40 millions-budget games. They're would be complain, but I still appreciate the way Nintendo is doing games.

when does the game come out in japan

3rd December mister.

That makes no sense :P. Why not just look for the game's budget and then rate it according to that then? I don't care if someone spends 3 thousand million dollars to make a game, if it turns out not to be fun, it's simply not a good game.

Going by that site, FFXIII will be 3x as big... so an opening week of 1m seems out of the question.

I heard some parts seemed too much like NSMB for the DS. Any of the same levels?

All reasons which tell me the first week won't be drastically high. Around 700k seems reasonable to me.

I just went to the website and feel this thread is about the wrong game. If we are talking about pre-oders.