guiduc said:
I think it's because it would be unfair for big games like MW2 where they spent much more time on graphics, sound (sound score made by Hans Zimmer, they spent a lot...) If Mario was rated for fun, this game had gotten about 95, which would be unfair for those big 40 millions-budget games. They're would be complain, but I still appreciate the way Nintendo is doing games. |
That makes no sense :P. Why not just look for the game's budget and then rate it according to that then? I don't care if someone spends 3 thousand million dollars to make a game, if it turns out not to be fun, it's simply not a good game.







