By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Natal will put 360 on top for the rest of the generation

huaxiong90 said:
jarrod said:
Hus said:
jarrod said:
 

Majority?  Looking at Nintendo's actual output, that really isn't the case at all... besides, I don't think Sony's even capable of making something as unaccessible, obtuse and "hardcore" as Fire Emblem.

 

 

 

Demon's souls says hi.

iam basing it of wiis big sellers, what sale best is casual stuff right.

You mean the game they had to farm out to FROM Software?  Yes, a true testament to Sony's ability to spend and contract when they themselves are clearly incapable...

 

And even, Wii's big (million+) sellers are more weighted to "established traditional" rather than "new casual".

Umm...you do know that both Sony and From Software worked on it, right? Sony decided to work with them to make a definitive King's Field successor.

Yeah, they had a producer and tech support from SCE Japan Studio.  The rest was FROM (and some subcontracted developers like Tose, Digital Works, Polygon Magic, etc).



Around the Network

Maybe if NIn could play well with other like Sony they have more variety in games and maybe id actually want to buy their console for their 1st party games.

I take Halo is not a MS game in your mind cause they don't own bungie.



Hus said:
Maybe if NIn could play well with other like Sony they have more variety in games and maybe id actually want to buy their console for their 1st party games.

I take Halo is not a MS game in your mind cause they don't own bungie.

They owned Bungie while Halo 1-3 were in development.  Also, Nintendo's worked with more external developers than Sony or Microsoft this gen on 1st party projects.



You said it. Crazy.



jarrod said:
Hus said:
Maybe if NIn could play well with other like Sony they have more variety in games and maybe id actually want to buy their console for their 1st party games.

I take Halo is not a MS game in your mind cause they don't own bungie.

They owned Bungie while Halo 1-3 were in development.  Also, Nintendo's worked with more external developers than Sony or Microsoft this gen on 1st party projects.

Then those games arent their own, they just farm out to other developers cause they are clearly incapable of developing them on their own as you'd say right ?

ODST is not MS game then, nor will Reach be a MS game.  According to your standards.

 



Around the Network
Hus said:
jarrod said:
Hus said:
Maybe if NIn could play well with other like Sony they have more variety in games and maybe id actually want to buy their console for their 1st party games.

I take Halo is not a MS game in your mind cause they don't own bungie.

They owned Bungie while Halo 1-3 were in development.  Also, Nintendo's worked with more external developers than Sony or Microsoft this gen on 1st party projects.

Then those games arent their own, they just farm out to other developers cause they are clearly incapable of developing them on their own as you'd say right ?

ODST is not MS game then, nor will Reach be a MS game.  According to your standards.

 

By my standards neither ODST or Reach were made by Microsoft.  That doesn't mean they're not Microsoft games.



i hope it does well and i think it will (at the right price) outselling the wii would take a hell of alot though but hey you never know. With good adverts and software it just might. As for the sony wand errr no.



jarrod said:
huaxiong90 said:
jarrod said:
Hus said:
jarrod said:
 

Majority?  Looking at Nintendo's actual output, that really isn't the case at all... besides, I don't think Sony's even capable of making something as unaccessible, obtuse and "hardcore" as Fire Emblem.

 

 

 

Demon's souls says hi.

iam basing it of wiis big sellers, what sale best is casual stuff right.

You mean the game they had to farm out to FROM Software?  Yes, a true testament to Sony's ability to spend and contract when they themselves are clearly incapable...

 

And even, Wii's big (million+) sellers are more weighted to "established traditional" rather than "new casual".

Umm...you do know that both Sony and From Software worked on it, right? Sony decided to work with them to make a definitive King's Field successor.

Yeah, they had a producer and tech support from SCE Japan Studio.  The rest was FROM (and some subcontracted developers like Tose, Digital Works, Polygon Magic, etc).

Producer support? Wouldn't that mean then that Sony are capable, to some extent?

 

@adam84: What you listed as factors of success for natal:

-Adverts

-Software

-Price

 

...also apply to the wand.



Rockstar: Announce Bully 2 already and make gamers proud!

Kojima: Come out with Project S already!

huaxiong90 said:
jarrod said:
huaxiong90 said:
jarrod said:
Hus said:
jarrod said:
 

Majority?  Looking at Nintendo's actual output, that really isn't the case at all... besides, I don't think Sony's even capable of making something as unaccessible, obtuse and "hardcore" as Fire Emblem.

 

 

 

Demon's souls says hi.

iam basing it of wiis big sellers, what sale best is casual stuff right.

You mean the game they had to farm out to FROM Software?  Yes, a true testament to Sony's ability to spend and contract when they themselves are clearly incapable...

 

And even, Wii's big (million+) sellers are more weighted to "established traditional" rather than "new casual".

Umm...you do know that both Sony and From Software worked on it, right? Sony decided to work with them to make a definitive King's Field successor.

Yeah, they had a producer and tech support from SCE Japan Studio.  The rest was FROM (and some subcontracted developers like Tose, Digital Works, Polygon Magic, etc).

Producer support? Wouldn't that mean then that Sony are capable, to some extent?

 

@adam84: What you listed as factors of success for natal:

-Adverts

-Software

-Price

 

...also apply to the wand.

There was a SCE Japan Studio producer and FROM Soft producer.  That's usually how it goes with contracted games.

I say Sony's definitely a capable dev, but they've never really homegrown as "hardcore" a game as Fire Emblem.  Anything that's ever come close (Demon's Souls, Carnage Heart, etc) was always done by someone else.



Ok, but wouldn't that mean Sony contributed in the way of the game design?



Rockstar: Announce Bully 2 already and make gamers proud!

Kojima: Come out with Project S already!