By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - halo reach to have better graphics than uncharted 2 or killzone 2 confirmed

Squilliam on 21 November 2009
Attoyou said:
we should compare halo reach to PS3 games coming out next year, Its a little ignorant To say WOW THIS GAME LOOKS AS GOOD AS GAMES OUT LAST YEAR OR TWO YEARS AGO!

He only has access to released PS3 games to compare it to obviously.



Tease.

Around the Network
XxXProphecyXxX on 21 November 2009

@Attoyou

Actually this whole thread is pretty ignorant specially with the "Confirmed" in the title cause there isnt even at least a screen shot to base this on all we have is MS them selves saying their game will look better.



elticker on 21 November 2009
XxXProphecyXxX said:
@Attoyou

Actually this whole thread is pretty ignorant specially with the "Confirmed" in the title cause there isnt even at least a screen shot to base this on all we have is MS them selves saying their game will look better.

i am not sure what aaron meant but i think he mean't graphically and gameplay not sure.

at first i htought he was comparing them graphically but then i say why not the fun factor.



 

 

Reasonable on 21 November 2009

Reading the source this sounds way out of context. Perhaps Reach will match Killzone 2, but his words are very PR spin. I see no reason 360 couldn't support KZ2 level graphics, but this is a very tenuous source.

When MS issue public statements to formal sites, etc. saying this is what Reach is going to deliver graphically, then I'll take this more seriously.

EDIT : BTW this is the least 'confirmed' bit of news I've seen for a while, pls let's watch thread titles, okay.  This is speculation based on a single, non-specific quote.



Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...

Porcupine_I on 21 November 2009

Has anyone even read the linked Article before commenting?

...or before writing the Title for the thread for that matter



“It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank Big Brother for raising the chocolate ration to twenty grams a week. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the ration was to be reduced to twenty grams a week. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.”

- George Orwell, ‘1984’

Around the Network
Slimebeast on 21 November 2009

 

I called this.

Slimebeast said:
It's funny how bad people are at judging graphics quality. Only because the image quality is bad it hinders them from seeing how incredible these grafix are.

This I thought Halo on Xbox 3 would look like, not Halo in this gen already.

Better graphics than anything so far in this generation.

 

 

Slimebeast said:
Carl2291 said:
People are saying the graphics will destroy anything on PS3... And are the best this generation....

When the images are blurry and in (likely) in Alpha?

You are seriously comparing blurry alpha pics to Crysis... Killzone 2... Uncharted 2...?

It looks good, but not THAT good.

Destroy is too strong of a word. And no, visually GT5 is the best looking game in this gen from what we've seen so far. But anything else, yes, Halo Reach will look better.

I find it amusing that people are unable to see it (well, not u Carl). So I'm gonna make a prediciton so I can claim I called this later: 

Of all the games announced and released so far, Halo: Reach will be considered the best looking once we're seen proper gameplay footage 
(except for GT5, but then cos it's a racing game it kinda has an advantage).

Again, people take a look at this screen. It's all apparent on this screen that this game has a different level of graphics tech we've seen on X360 before:



And just for reference, Halo 3:

 



waron on 21 November 2009

is this mean that Halo Reach will have fugly brown color palette, crapy artstyle and Master Chiefs butt cheeks right in front of you for the whole time?
no thank you.
as long as it will still have usual artstyle and graphics on RE5/Lost Planet 2 level i will be happy.



PlaystaionGamer on 21 November 2009

yes microsoft. of COURSE it will



Scoobes on 21 November 2009

I doubt it, the comment was taken out of context... and it was from Greenburg. Anything Aaron Greenburg says tends to be crap. Of course whether true or not is pointless when Crytek finally release Crysis 2 multiplat and both PS3 and 360 first parties will go "Crap.... how did they do that?!"




Get your Portable ID!

BladeOfGod on 21 November 2009
XxXProphecyXxX said:
I dont get ppl in this site...I will probly be called a troll for this but why is it when sony first party devs praises their own game ppl call it BS or go "Well of course their gonna say that" but then now MS is doing it every 1 takes their word for it....seems rather sad TBH.

Its funny how everyone ignored your post

 

EDIT: to answer your question its because 360 fans are the ones who decide what PR statement is BS and what not.