By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - VG CHARTZ widgets,

omgwtfbbq said:
alpha_dk said:
omgwtfbbq said:
stof said:
Don't you have to get Vista to get the widget rip offs on Windows? (what are they called again? gadgets?)

So don't you have to subject both your computer and yourself to abject torture just to wait for the inevitable windows rip off?

If that's not the case, I apologize.

Whatever you have on your mac has been available on Linux for a long time.


Now don't get me wrong, i love linux, and my main computers run linux (the only thing that runs something else is my dualbooting OSX/XP pro laptop)... but that's just wrong. Adium is by far the AIM program to beat on any system that I have used... Kopete is the closest I have found on Linux, and Trillian on PC. IMO, of course, and if you know a program on linux that is as good as Adium I would love to know it, because the main reason I even have my laptop on ever is because Kopete annoys me.

Also, I have yet to use a media player I liked more than OS X's version of VLC. The windows and linux versions just are not as easy on the eyes, and the linux one at least lacks a full-screen controller. I haven't watched movies on my windows partition in a long enough time that I won't comment on it.

Furthermore, I don't care what you say, rsync is not in the same LEAGUE as time machine. It has its uses, and I use it extensively, but in terms of ease of use? Not in the least. If time machine gets people to use backups, then all the more power to Apple; an easy *incremental* *automatic* backup solution is something that should have happened a long time ago... rsync comes close, but is not nearly easy enough to set up that Joe Q. Public will use it and have it be effective.

That said, linux does have its strong points in terms of stuff that *isn't* really available on a mac. KTorrent is by far tied for the best torrent program I have used (with µTorrent). Macs have Transmission.... and Transmission (and Azeureus) Transmission doesn't support encryption yet; that means that those whose ISPs packet shape (cough comcast cough) will be SOL if they use it to download, say, the newest Kubuntu distro (can you sense the bitterness here?)

So yes, Linux is awesome - but saying that *everything* is available on linux is patently wrong.

interesting you pick adium, since it's based on the open source libgaim libraries (now known as libpurple) which debuted on Linux for the gaim (now pidgin) im program. VLC as well, since it is an open source cross platform media player which is available on all three major platforms (no idea which it debuted on though). Also, funny how you point out time machine and then go on to say linux has an equivelant (rsync, which has been around since 1996)

You have bascally proven my exact point. All these things you have mentioned were either on Linux first or (actually in all cases) developed by some small-time open source developer to be cross platform. Apple have on strength, and it is not in inventing new features, no matter what 90% of Apple fanboys will say. Apple takes features from other platforms, and makes the interface simple and polished. Almost every amazing new feature is developed by some random guy with a great idea and is implemented as a third party add-on for mac/windows/linux. The open source nature of Linux means many of these features get quickly built upon and integrated if it's good.

Of course, the nature of open source development is that most development happens "to scratch an itch", and developers tend to write programs for themselves rather than other people. As such, these programs tend to be powerful and functional first, and easy to use (where easy to use = pretty gui) second. Apple takes these ideas and polishes them up. Microsoft then takes these ideas and bollocks them up. Saying every single little feature is available on Linux is of course wrong, but I would say almost every major feature in mac osx has been available on Linux in some form or another for years previously.


 The fact that they are all built on OSS libraries (except transmission, I don't think thats OSS and I have no clue what it is built on.  I hate it anyways) is actually the reason I chose those programs.  They take the backend of all these programs, and have a massively improved user interface and inner workings (IMO).  It's nothing that couldn't be done on linux -- it just hasn't yet.  That's what pretty much exemplifies the way OS X works in my mind.  It takes great ideas that may just not be easy, and makes them easy.  It says "What does this program do that isn't necessary 95% of the time" and hides them, while takeing the stuff that *is* needed and making it easier and more obvious; all the functionality remains, but it is hidden so that you only find about about it when you need it.

 For example, at any time on an OS X machine you can press control and use the scroll wheel, and it will zoom in on the screen.  I have been using OS X for 2 years now and I first found it out about 2 weeks ago.  And I keep finding those kinds of features!  Added functionality that most people will never need; but it is there and easily accessible for those who do need it.  And *that* functionality is what I am talking about being present in OS X development but not really anywhere else (although it is present in linux development... I think Compiz does this well). 



Please, PLEASE do NOT feed the trolls.
fksumot tag: "Sheik had to become a man to be useful. Or less useful. Might depend if you're bi."

--Predictions--
1) WiiFit will outsell the pokemans.
  Current Status: 2009.01.10 70k till PKMN Yellow (Passed: Emerald, Crystal, FR/LG)

Around the Network

The thing is, I can have Linux (Ubuntu 7.10) perfectly emulate a Mac desktop almost natively with the dock, windows and menubar-at-the-top, and I can have it emulate a Vista desktop perfectly with the window borders and everything almost natively, but I can't have Vista or Mac OS X have the features of the other environment as if native.

On Linux, there is little distinction between "OS" and "Applications".



Ubuntu. Linux for human beings.

If you are interested in trying Ubuntu or Linux in general, PM me and I will answer your questions and help you install it if you wish.

Wish i knew what a widget was.



So wait, I never got an answer to my original question. Does Microsoft XP have a widget equivalent? or is it only Vista with it's "gadgets"?



I'm a mod, come to me if there's mod'n to do. 

Chrizum is the best thing to happen to the internet, Period.

Serves me right for challenging his sales predictions!

Bet with dsisister44: Red Steel 2 will sell 1 million within it's first 365 days of sales.

stof said:
Don't you have to get Vista to get the widget rip offs on Windows? (what are they called again? gadgets?)

So don't you have to subject both your computer and yourself to abject torture just to wait for the inevitable windows rip off?

If that's not the case, I apologize.

Widgets or gadgets as they are called in Vista were in the 2002 Longhorne Beta as was Live search or spotlight as it is known in OSX. this was a full 2 years earlier before they were introduced and Tiger and a year earlier before tehy were even announced by Apple. Also widgets and gadgets are both rip offs of Konfubalator.

 

Personally I dislike widgets/gadgets as they just seem pointless I always turn them off or remove the hotkeys for them in the case of OSX where they are obtrusive especially if you use a mighty mouse.



Around the Network
stof said:
So wait, I never got an answer to my original question. Does Microsoft XP have a widget equivalent? or is it only Vista with it's "gadgets"?

Nope XP does not have native support for gadget/widgets.



@ TWRoO widgets are just a really small application.... i think they were originally used when computers had problems multitasking

 

also true that they showed up in longhorn preview first but BeOS had them before that, it also had a version of spotlight, indexing, and pretty much every other major osx upgrade, that was not already in NExtstep. and if you want to go really far back windowss v1 had clock as a widget equivelent... it was a key featre talked about by balmer in their promotional material 



come play minecraft @  mcg.hansrotech.com

minecraft name: hansrotec

XBL name: Goddog

goddog said:

@ TWRoO widgets are just a really small application.... i think they were originally used when computers had problems multitasking

 

also true that they showed up in longhorn preview first but BeOS had them before that, it also had a version of spotlight, indexing, and pretty much every other major osx upgrade, that was not already in NExtstep. and if you want to go really far back windowss v1 had clock as a widget equivelent... it was a key featre talked about by balmer in their promotional material 


Yup it was on BeOS and it was also a program available for linux before the Longhorn preview. I only mention it when people go on and on about how Vista "copied" those features from OS X. Personally I don't care as I can't really think of anything truly innovative that has come directly from Apple or MS in a longtime...without them buying up a company or patent.

 

Personally I am dieing to see if Amiga 5.0 is going to retain any of its former greatness. I have my fingers crossed but am pretty wary(not the same team). the only question now is did PARC have any widget equivilents? Anybody here actually own a STAR?



TWRoO said:
Wish i knew what a widget was.

 Widgets are a great little application. At any time, no matter what applications I'm running, I can move my mouse to the lower right corner, press f12 or click the "dashboard" icon to bring up the dashboard. And when I do, a tinted see through screen comes over top of everything else with a series of small applications in it. You can chose what applicatino you want from ones made by apple or created by users. 

 

Right now when I go to my dashboard I have applications to check the weather, time, date, a calculator, universal converter(set to currency), posted notes with costume ideas, my itunes player, some Toronto Traffic webcams, a google search, address book, wikipedia serch, dictionary, Rotten Tomatoes rating finder (halloween got 90%, Halloween 2 got 19!) and a spedometer telling me how much processing power I'm using (not many). So I can access all this info within half of a second, and then flick back to my other programs.

 

And now, as soon as Leapord comes out and I get Safari 3.0, I'll now be able to check VG chartz numbers just as easily.

It's quite nice.

 



I'm a mod, come to me if there's mod'n to do. 

Chrizum is the best thing to happen to the internet, Period.

Serves me right for challenging his sales predictions!

Bet with dsisister44: Red Steel 2 will sell 1 million within it's first 365 days of sales.

alpha_dk said:
 

The fact that they are all built on OSS libraries (except transmission, I don't think thats OSS and I have no clue what it is built on. I hate it anyways) is actually the reason I chose those programs. They take the backend of all these programs, and have a massively improved user interface and inner workings (IMO). It's nothing that couldn't be done on linux -- it just hasn't yet. That's what pretty much exemplifies the way OS X works in my mind. It takes great ideas that may just not be easy, and makes them easy. It says "What does this program do that isn't necessary 95% of the time" and hides them, while takeing the stuff that *is* needed and making it easier and more obvious; all the functionality remains, but it is hidden so that you only find about about it when you need it.

For example, at any time on an OS X machine you can press control and use the scroll wheel, and it will zoom in on the screen. I have been using OS X for 2 years now and I first found it out about 2 weeks ago. And I keep finding those kinds of features! Added functionality that most people will never need; but it is there and easily accessible for those who do need it. And *that* functionality is what I am talking about being present in OS X development but not really anywhere else (although it is present in linux development... I think Compiz does this well).

So you agree with me! =) And yes desktop zoom has been present in Linux for quite some time, of course screen magnifiers were present for even longer (as they don't need compositing support). But essentially you're saying exactly the same thing I did, that someone else comes up with the idea, and Apple just implements it well.

 



Help! I'm stuck in a forum signature!