By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Digital Foundry - Face-Off : Modern Warfare 2 ... 360 wins again...

The people who truly care for image quality do not look for it on the PS3 or Xbox 360 so the argument is being carried on by people who only care insofar as to back up some stupid console points match against people who own a different console.

In motion its a different story, however I know how little people still care for the quality in motion due to the lack of high quality feeds being used for comparison. If you bring youtube or gametrailers into something like this you are NOT PIMPING because people who can tell the difference would truely never use those two places as a source.



Tease.

Around the Network

Wow, why go waste a perfectly good thread by posting blatant flamebait.. especially terribly untrue flamebait...

 

edit* Thank you for the new sig Selnor, I've been waiting for the house for awhile but it doens't look like you're going to give it to me :p



Sardauk said:
nen-suer said:
Wass said:
Did he just said MW2 looks better than KZ2?

No, he said xbox360 version of MW2 looks better than Kz2

PS3 MW2 still sucks

This

No I seriously believe it looks better. I spend a lot of time on KZ2 and it is graphics killer ... but IMO MW2 looks even better.

The problem remains the same, KZ2 has incredible lightning and weather effects ->but poor texturing<- and subpar 3D modeling.

Anyway.... you can't say anything about KZ2 here...

 

 

LOL'D



Sardauk said:

Enjoy : http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-modern-warfare-2-face-off

"

At the end of the day, in terms of the buying decision, the sheer importance of the game's multiplayer component is such that it's your choice of friends list that is going to determine which version of Modern Warfare 2 you buy. While the PS3 version has had some early glitches, bugs and party issues, it's also readily apparent that Infinity Ward is continually working to make sure the game works as it should.

However, for those that haven't made up their minds, it's fairly easy to say that while both renditions of the game are well worthy of the Eurogamer 9/10 score, the Xbox 360's marginally superior visuals and significantly smoother performance gives it an undoubted edge over the PlayStation 3 game, and this translates directly into a tangibly better gameplay experience."

 

Now that we have a better looking (multiplat) game on the 360 that looks better than KZ2 and runs better on the 360... I hope Sony PR will cut the bulls about the so-called technical superiority of the PS3 over the 360. When a PS3 games looks better, it is thanks to the genius of the developers... not the plateform...

thats all that needs to be said.



wow its interesting to see that MW2 has worse performance on the ps3 than the 360 when its predecessor was equal. Hmm M$ must have payed IW! ;)



Long Live SHIO!

Around the Network

i got mw2 yesterday it hasnt got better grafix than killzone 2.

i cant believe the blindness of some ppl.



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

LMFAO ! MW2 LOOKS BETTER THEN KZ2!? ?!?!?!?!?!?!?! Ya and MW1 looks better then Crysis .



Atto Suggests...:

Book - Malazan Book of the Fallen series 

Game - Metro Last Light

TV - Deadwood

Music - Forest Swords 

selnor said:
MasterHien said:
Wow is this for for for REAL?
i got Modern warefare 2 on the PS3 and i know the 360 version looks better but not by Far and people already saying it is graphically better than Killzone 2? WOW!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrUfi-jmK_0

so your telling me Modern warefare 2 which i got and PLAYED is graphically better than that?
In my opinions the PS3 modern warefare 2 get Destroys graphically by KZ2 by far and the same is said for 360 since graphics between both console is not much difference in MW2, am i right?


I fail to see how the video you posted competes with MW2:

LOOOL your not serious about that video YOU posted, There a nice gap improvement between COD4 and COD6 but boy you seriously think that looks better than KZ2, your brain washed. You probably never played KZ2



PSN: HienTran2691

XBL: IVietCong

When things like this happen, people blame the PS3, when they should be blaming the developer. They are using the 360 as the lead platform and the PS3 is harder to develop for.
PS3 1st party devs should share their experience with 3rd party devs.
The differences are minute anyway.



Netyaroze said:
I saw it today and you can argue that MW2 fits better to your personal taste but it certainly has not better Graphics then KZ2 I dont care who says this because I can see it that its not better. It has here and there an edge over Killzone 2 but if you add everything together KZ2 is the Winner. I think most people just forgot how good KZ2 looks.

Its just a hype at the moment in some months everyone will see it clearer and its not the new Graphics King on Consoles especially if you think that Uncharted 2 looks in every way better then MW2 there is no discussion about it.

The Xbox360 has yet to prof that it can make better Graphics then the PS3 until now PS3 is the Graphics King and everybody knows that. Maybe it will change after Crysis 2.

Today the PS3 superiority over Xbox360 is proven. And I dont know anyone who doubt this.

What a pile of rubbish.

The differences between the games are marginal but the Xbox renders faster with more effects.

This is unsurprising given the design choices and memory constraints in the PS3 and the Xbox respectively.

The Ps3 when specifically programmed for and when the game is engineered from the ground up to

1. Take advantage of the Cell processor

2. Compensate for the bottlenecks in the render pipeline.

Does look better than many Xbox games.

However to develop given these constraints is near commercial suicide.

If a DEV can go multiplat, he will go multiplat.