By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Do you believe sales are indicator of quality?

No, becasue halo 3 had bad graphix yet it still sold more than cod4 on the xbox



Around the Network
kingofwale said:
hell no.

if yes, then you will see

Transformers > Schindler's List
Toyota Corolla > ferrari california
Dell > Mac
...

Yeah, but that is directly comparing static sales numbers. If you compared those movies, cars, and computers to similar computers in the same price range, released at the same time, with the same marketing and hype, it might help you determine which of the two consumers would pick assuming all things are equal.

Again, static sales numbers are an indication of nothing but popularity. Comparitive sales of very similar products can help you determine which has great value, and in rare instances, quality, in the eyes of the most consumers.

Ironically, PS3 vs 360 for a moment, approached the line of sales being a factor in helping us determine value, if not quality.

Don't many people, everyday, on this forum claim that the quality of the PS3 along with the quality of its library will help it come out on top of the 360 in the end? Aren't they implying that quality can help or hurt sales, and thus, sales can in rare instances be an indication of value, if not quality?



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

To a small degree yes. But chances are if you keep buying games based on others' choices, you're bound to be disappointed ever so often.



"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)

"WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler

gurglesletch said:
No, becasue halo 3 had bad graphix yet it still sold more than cod4 on the xbox

Graphics don't make gameplay. Are we forgetting the PS2 had the worst graphics last gen. Yet, still sold the most software?







VGChartz♥♥♥♥♥FOREVER

Xbone... the new "N" word   Apparently I troll MS now | Evidence | Evidence
pbroy said:
No.. sales is an indicator of hype

What if games have the exact same hype, marketing, release date, platform, and IP recognition? Then, would percieved quality(reviews) potentially be a determing factor in sales?



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

Around the Network
pbroy said:
gurglesletch said:
No, becasue halo 3 had bad graphix yet it still sold more than cod4 on the xbox

Graphics don't make gameplay. Are we forgetting the PS2 had the worst graphics last gen. Yet, still sold the most software?

It had the highest quality, and I submit that said high quality of library had a small part to play in its amazing sales.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

ZenfoldorVGI said:
pbroy said:
gurglesletch said:
No, becasue halo 3 had bad graphix yet it still sold more than cod4 on the xbox

Graphics don't make gameplay. Are we forgetting the PS2 had the worst graphics last gen. Yet, still sold the most software?

It had the highest quality, and I submit that said high quality of library had a small part to play in its amazing sales.

The Gamecube/Xbox ports had better graphics, but the PS2 versions sold more.







VGChartz♥♥♥♥♥FOREVER

Xbone... the new "N" word   Apparently I troll MS now | Evidence | Evidence
pbroy said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
pbroy said:
gurglesletch said:
No, becasue halo 3 had bad graphix yet it still sold more than cod4 on the xbox

Graphics don't make gameplay. Are we forgetting the PS2 had the worst graphics last gen. Yet, still sold the most software?

It had the highest quality, and I submit that said high quality of library had a small part to play in its amazing sales.

The Gamecube/Xbox ports had better graphics, but the PS2 versions sold more.

I think we're talking about two different things. Don't misunderstand me. I'm discussing the PS2 hardware. I'm saying that library quality had a small(or large) effect on sales of that hardware. Software quality between platforms can't use sales as a factor in opinionating said quality, cause the userbase and thus audience is different, and again, using sales as a factor for software is absolutely relative to other very similar software on the same platform, with the same hype levels, ect.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

To a certain extent.



ZenfoldorVGI said:
pbroy said:
No.. sales is an indicator of hype

What if games have the exact same hype, marketing, release date, platform, and IP recognition? Then, would percieved quality(reviews) potentially be a determing factor in sales?

If it was last gen, Playstation had a better brand name. The Playstation name had the most hype. Wherever the flock of sheep go. This gen, the flock went to 360 in the US.







VGChartz♥♥♥♥♥FOREVER

Xbone... the new "N" word   Apparently I troll MS now | Evidence | Evidence