--OkeyDokey-- said:
Wait, what's wrong with the multiplayer? |
For what i've seen.. This:
--OkeyDokey-- said:
Wait, what's wrong with the multiplayer? |
For what i've seen.. This:
multplayer is great, though down at them moment!
I'm afraid I will not be able to take user reviews for this game seriously. It seems like PC gamers are doing everything from pretending to be console players to acting like even the single player is terrible in order to hinder sales.
It plays like a tweaked COD4, which is what I expected. My initial impressions are the single player in CoD4 is better; whereas, the multiplayer in MW2 is better.
Also, try not to state your opinion on the Internet. People assume you have an ulterior motive. Not because you do, it's because they do.
Thanks for the input, Jeff.
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Graphics don't have anything to do with the quality of a game. Elite Beat Agents is as good, in my opinion, as any game on your list, and it's graphics are shitty. OOT is one of the best games of all time, and it's graphics are terrible. Crysis has far better graphics than anything you've listed, and good gameplay, but it's nowhere near as good as MW2. I don't know why you're so hung up on graphics. The graphical presentation is fine. The game is v-synced at 60fps. It can only look so good on a console, and as good as the graphics are, it's actually stunning that IW was able to achieve those things. Imagine if you V-synced Drakes Fortune and then tried to actually play it. The game is graphically impressive because of what it is able to achieve with performance on consoles at such a high level of graphical fidelity(vlock, 30-60fps, onscreen action that isn't wallpaper, ect), and that's why it got such high graphical scores, imho. |
Crysis>MW2
lol so much for MW2 killing KZ2. Looks like it isn't the end all of FPS games after all. I'll be waiting for kz3 instead.
"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)
"WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler
| MAFKKA said: ^ Thats sad |
Ugh, here comes a flashback. . .
"You'll be completely reliant on IWnet for all the multiplayer"
While the gameplay wont be like that all the time, I still don't like the idea of being forced into matchmaking.
Mendicate Bias said:
So a game could have the best shooting mechanics and gameplay in the world but if it doesn't have features that you deem important then its a pile of shit. Good to know. |
Too bad there are games out there that have better shooting mechanics and have been out for years... I dare anyone to try and defend this games shitty multiplayer.
Also they aren't just features but they affect gameplay heavily, which makes gameplay suck horribly.
For the record, Doom 2 also has some pretty good shooting mechanics. I should start comparing this game with FPSes from mid 90s just so I can give it a fair shot and not blowing chunks, and even then it would probably lose.
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835
