By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Why Aren't There Reviews For Modern Warfare?

Falcon095 on 10 November 2009

Activision is so sure of this game's bombing that the will make the reviewers buy their copies!



||Tag courtesy of fkusumot - "Heaven is like a Nintendo theme park!"||Join the Medal of Honor: Heroes 2 American League HERE!||

Around the Network
Galaki on 10 November 2009

If it bombs, guess who they're going to blame?



Pre-order limited edition Blue Slime Condoms

Stefan.De.Machtige on 10 November 2009
the_bloodwalker said:

I just hope they don't start any BS that the game didn't sell on Wii.

I haven't seen a single advertisement from Activision

There is a 99% chance they will.



In the wilderness we go alone with our new knowledge and strength.

outlawauron on 10 November 2009
LordTheNightKnight said:
outlawauron said:
World at War also did not have reviews before release and look how that turned out..... oh wait.

Not quite sure what you mean there.

"True, but you do realize that not every embargoed game gets mediocre scores?"

I meant time as in being an older game.

I was making a joke about how I think World at War sucked.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

bazmeistergen on 10 November 2009

Out of interest there's already about 8500 people online and the number is increasing rapidly. I'm pretty sure this is going to be a success. Chrizum and I and a few others monitored figures like this last time with WaW. It gave us an idea that the game was undertracked. I guess we could include these numbers on the official thread.



Yes.

www.spacemag.org - contribute your stuff... satire, comics, ideas, debate, stupidy stupid etc.

Around the Network
Euphoria14 on 10 November 2009

There is one review on N4G, from ONM. 80/100.

he whole fuss around the original Modern Warfare arose because it was a punchy depiction of modern, dirty combat and unfortunately, this Wii version with its flat and muddy textures and short draw distances just can't compete. Given the extra two years Treyarch had to squeeze every last drop of polish from the Wii, this is underwhelming visually. It looks okay for a Wii game - that's the dreaded caveat - but it's not even up there with Metroid Prime: Corruption. 

Having said that, Modern Warfare is still an excellent shooter packed with options and it should be a big player online so we can welcome it to the Wii family. It's about flamin' time!

http://www.officialnintendomagazine.co.uk/article.php?id=13130



iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.

Currently playing:

Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)     

    

Got a retro room? Post it here!

LordTheNightKnight on 10 November 2009
outlawauron said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
outlawauron said:
World at War also did not have reviews before release and look how that turned out..... oh wait.

Not quite sure what you mean there.

"True, but you do realize that not every embargoed game gets mediocre scores?"

I meant time as in being an older game.

I was making a joke about how I think World at War sucked.

Although it still sold well regardless. I am looking forward to this game, though. It's a toss up between this and Crystal Bearers.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

intro94 on 10 November 2009

activision began the online advertisement of MW today, at IGN.