Kasz216 said:
The US has hit hard times, but the majority of the people still hardly feel it.
Pakistan up until recently has been under the control of a dictator.
I don't think they wanna give the new guys too much regulatory power right away.
Don't you think this crisis was unavoiadable at some point? It was all flow with no ebb with the economy with politians pushing harder and harder to get rid of any eb through numerous means. That it caught back up with us one way or another is no surprise.
|
If you're saying that the occaisional downturn is necessary in order that certain elements of the economy can restructure themselves to deal with changing needs, and that strong growth can't be perpetually maintained, I agree completely.
The point of regulation and other government involvement is to smooth out the curves. That means curtailing both the spikes and the troughs to improve the stability of the whole economy. Slow down the radical changes so that fewer people get hurt and the system itself doesn't collapse on a hard downturn. Otherwise you "ride the tail of the dragon" as the macroeconomists say.
I agree that one of the factors in this crisis was that the powers that be tried too hard for too long to stave off a recession. Interest rates were too low for too long, and if the economy had just been let down gently five years ago, things would be easier today.
Effective regulation is tricky business, and failure can have some negative repercussions, but I still feel it's essential to maintaining competition, preventing deception, and integrating externalities into the market.