CGI-Quality said:
slowmo said: If by disbelief you mean I don't believe the numbers are accurate then yes.
I really don't care either way personally, week 1 sales will show the true demand in the end and I don't mind waiting. They better launch this as a finished product though because the game will tank if they go the beta route home went down. |
Again, why?
Black and green: HOME and MAG aren't comparable. They weren't selling HOME, though 8-9mill users isn't tanking.
|
Good for you, I'm sure there is constantly 8-9 million individuals using it each week. Home tanked big style given the huge expectation placed upon it by both Sony and the fanbase who waited over a year for it. If you enjoy it then fine thats your opinion, personally speaking it was a complete waste of time and resources and I'd rather they funded another AAA first party title instead. Feel free to disagree, you're not changing my perception of Home and vice versa.
It is comparable in the fact it's a online only experience, if the netcode isn't up to the job when the servers fill then it will be a disaster and the legs will be cut from under it. Home has spent all this time trying to recover from what was a very sparse and boring beta introduction, MAG needs to hit the ground running or it will suffer a backlash.
OT - Why shouldn't I have the right to question VG Chartz numbers, it's not like they have a 100% acuracy rating. I don't go around saying all the data on here is innaccurate but I believe that pre orders more than anything else tracked can be one of the most inaccurate records, right up there with software sales on occasion.