I understand the video, but I think the guy kind of waffles on his opinion in the end.
He basically goes on about how the Cell + RSX of the PS3 just edges out the Xenon + Xenos of the X360 in terms of the end result, but the comparison is about CPUs, not CPU + GPU.
Talking CPUs only, the PS3/Cell absolutely destroys the X360/Xenon -- enough to make up the differences in the GPUs, and then some, as is evidenced by the end results. I also completely disagree with his statement that the SPEs are "not cores". He's making up his own definition here, and that costs him some credibility, in my book. They ARE cores. Plenty of processors lacked caches and other convenience/auto-speedup hardware back in the day -- that didn't stop them from being CPU cores. That's kinda like saying some cars aren't real cars, because they lack automatic transmissions -- yeah, ridiculous.
I'm pretty sure the X360 will "win" the "GPU only" comparison they do next.
















