By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Can God create a rock so big that he can't lift it?

appolose said:

My answer attempts to demonstrate the question is a nonsensical one, much like the questions "How many hours are in a mile?", or "Why is 5 bigger than 10?".  As it's nonsense, the question poses nothing.

If God can lift any rock, then, by definition, there can be no such thing as un unliftable rock.  God cannot circumvent logic (because that means nothing), but that does not mean He couldn't be omnipotent.

So therefore God cannot do absolutley anything. Whether that qualifies him as not being omnipotent or not is up to you, but by your own statement God cannot create an unliftable rock because an unliftable rock cannot exist.



Around the Network
Rath said:
appolose said:
 

My answer attempts to demonstrate the question is a nonsensical one, much like the questions "How many hours are in a mile?", or "Why is 5 bigger than 10?".  As it's nonsense, the question poses nothing.

If God can lift any rock, then, by definition, there can be no such thing as un unliftable rock.  God cannot circumvent logic (because that means nothing), but that does not mean He couldn't be omnipotent.

So therefore God cannot do absolutley anything. Whether that qualifies him as not being omnipotent or not is up to you, but by your own statement God cannot create an unliftable rock because an unliftable rock cannot exist.

That's not really what Omnipotent means though.

Omnipotent simply means "all powerful."



Rath said:
appolose said:
 

My answer attempts to demonstrate the question is a nonsensical one, much like the questions "How many hours are in a mile?", or "Why is 5 bigger than 10?".  As it's nonsense, the question poses nothing.

If God can lift any rock, then, by definition, there can be no such thing as un unliftable rock.  God cannot circumvent logic (because that means nothing), but that does not mean He couldn't be omnipotent.

So therefore God cannot do absolutley anything. Whether that qualifies him as not being omnipotent or not is up to you, but by your own statement God cannot create an unliftable rock because an unliftable rock cannot exist.

The distinction is that God cannot do illogical things (which is what the question truly poses) because they are meaningless and nonexistent.  In that sense, He can  do absolutely everything, because illogical things aren't things at all.



Okami

To lavish praise upon this title, the assumption of a common plateau between player and game must be made.  I won't open my unworthy mouth.

Christian (+50).  Arminian(+20). AG adherent(+20). YEC(+20). Pre-tribulation Pre-milleniumist (+10).  Republican (+15) Capitalist (+15).  Pro-Nintendo (+5).  Misc. stances (+30).  TOTAL SCORE: 195
  http://quizfarm.com/test.php?q_id=43870 <---- Fun theology quiz

I don't know about God but I can create a rock so big I can't lift it.



Kasz216 said:
Rath said:
appolose said:
 

My answer attempts to demonstrate the question is a nonsensical one, much like the questions "How many hours are in a mile?", or "Why is 5 bigger than 10?".  As it's nonsense, the question poses nothing.

If God can lift any rock, then, by definition, there can be no such thing as un unliftable rock.  God cannot circumvent logic (because that means nothing), but that does not mean He couldn't be omnipotent.

So therefore God cannot do absolutley anything. Whether that qualifies him as not being omnipotent or not is up to you, but by your own statement God cannot create an unliftable rock because an unliftable rock cannot exist.

That's not really what Omnipotent means though.

Omnipotent simply means "all powerful."

And what does all powerful mean?

Does it mean unlimited power?



Around the Network
highwaystar101 said:
angrypoolman said:

I heard my one of my friends say this and act like theyre intelligent and shit for saying it, and it pissed me off. They thought that they cornered believers into some sort of corner and shit because no matter how you answer it you undermine God.

I was like, no you're not original, and no, you're not intelligent.. Furthurmore, that question is fucking stupid.

And I am curious.. why do you guys think it is a stupid question?

I'm sorry but why are we limited to agreeing with you about it being a stupid question?

As cliche as the question is, it does bring up a valid argument. The question gave you answers that all undermine God, now the two ways of getting out of this corner is you either pick an answer that you agree with the most, or you form a new answer that doesn't undermine God and corresponds to the evidence previously given in the debate. Calling it a stupid question is not a valid counter argument when it has forced you to give an answer. The fact that it is a valid argument that has forced you to give an answer is enough to justify the question itself.

Also. People who try to answer this question aren't trying to be intelligent, they are being honest with what they have been told and what they believe, just like you.

hahaha, you would be the person to ask that..

its because it is my thread and i created it so whatever i say goes.



Total Championships: Nintendo - 4, Sony - 2, Atari - 1, Microsoft - 0, Sega - 0

Oh, I see.

Apparently I misunderstood the intent of the topic altogether.

I will be on my way, then.



Words Of Wisdom said:
I don't know about God but I can create a rock so big I can't lift it.

Hehe, guess you're more powerful than God then XD



Soriku said:
Khuutra said:

Highway, God doesn't need to be infinite or to always have existed in order to have shaped the universe - see my last post. There's precedence for this stuff throughout many, many different mythologies. You're thinking of God as He must be to fit your worldview, when that isn't what God is about at all.

This next part is for everyone.

Now, as to why God can create somthing greater than himself: he already did.

The first thing that needs to be understood here is that most people's imagining of God (an invisible, omnipresent man in the skky who knows everything at once and can create or uncreate reality at will) is not in keeping with the original intent of the Jewish concept of Yahweh.

Dig this: in Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 alone, God was neither omniscient nor omnipotent. He did not know that Adam and Eve had eatn of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge until he discovered that they were hiding from him: God actulaly had to deduce that they had eaten from the tree, and that was only after calling out to them so that they'd stop hiding from him, because people are almost impossible to find when they hide in Eden, apparently.

The only question is when God created somethign greater than himself, and the answer is that he already did that in man.

When Jacob wrestled with God in Genesis 32 (and this is the generally accepted interpretation if you know your Jewish texts, or so I am told) it was shown that God was literally unable to overpower Jacob, and that when he saw this he crippled Jacob in the hip, and even then could not overpower him. When the Sun rose and Jacob still had not been cast down, Jacob demanded two things: a blessing and the name of the being that he had just finished grappling with. To the former he was belssed with Israel, but the latter was refused him because no man can know or hear the name of God.

What this means is immensely important, and was explained to me by a Jewish friend.

The most literal and consistent interpretation of this passage is that God wasn ot wrestlign with Jacob's physical form but the force of Jacob's will, which in the end he was unable to overpower. He crippled Jacob's body to remind him always of humanity's frailty, but because Jacob showed his will as unbreakable to God he was blessed and given a name for his land.

The point here is that man's will is firstly absolute and secondly sacrosanct, the highest form to which man can aspire. We are all supposed to wrestle with God, to question God and His teachings and everything about Him, arriving at truth through our own paths as an exercise of our wills. To accept God blindly is itself a rejection of the greatest and most powerful of his blessings, and an immense insult to God - most people think of Abraham sacrificing his son as being a great honor to God, but this is not so. Abraham spent mos of his life arguing with God, convincing him (more than once) to spare thel ives of people in spite of their inequities, and this is a part of why God loved him so much. it is only the, when he surrendered his will and was willing to sacrifice his son, that God stopped speaking to him. That's an important point that needs to be brought up: Abraham was one of the Biblical figures who used to walk around with God and chat with him about humanity, and that was taken away from him when he ceased to exercise his will.

So, yes. God can make such a rock. You're that rock.

More, God does not know everything all at once, (this is a fairly recent idea) God is not omnipotent, (this an almost exclusively Christian idea, I think) and God can be both reasoned with and overcome by the will of man.


Wow...this is a great post. Actually makes sense. I'm Christian so I think God is omnipotent but since you actually used some good examples from the Bible I'll be inclined to believe you.

@Words

But how do you make a rock? :P

From nothing, obviously. the Big Bang makes sO0ooo0 much sense.



The Big Bang always existed. It's been banging out galaxies forever. I should know, he and Orange Bang are my cousins.