By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - The vgchartz ranking game--Fable 2

Some peoples reviews shouldnt count as they are only trolling.

 

but 8.5 for me

 

+Awesome graphics

+Unique endings

+Addicting

 

- Not very deep, Clothing and Weapons 

-Second person is a henchman 

-Loading in between levels.



Around the Network

9.0

+ Atmosphere is awesome
+ Very nice art style
+ Pretty long if you do everything ( I played something like 30h)
+ Music is great
+ Main story is pretty good but ....

- .... too short
- Long loading times ( I played this before you got the option to install games...)
- Too easy ( You can't die)
- Combat is not that good ( because it is so easy)
- No replay value for me



This is just sad. Trolls broke the score of another great X360 exclusive.



chocoloco said:
5/10
Poor Graphics. Super simplified button mashing gameplay. Buying property more fun than the main campaign. Did I mention poor graphics. Annoying accents (not to say all British accents are annoying, nothing sexier than a none American female accent to me but still). In all, it was overated. Sorry to all who like it, but I cant deny it was boring.

I don't think anyone can seriously say the graphics were poor. The art style may have not been your thing (and it probably wasn't) but the graphics were average at worst. The textures were detailed, lighting was good, bloom effects were used appropriately to set the tone and there was a good diversity in environments. Also, I don't know how "buying property more fun than the main campaign" can be a negative. It's all still part of the game so if you enjoyed some part of the game it should be a plus.

Yes this is your opinion and you can rightfully express it but I'm curious to what makes you thinks the graphics are "poor"?



Slimebeast said:
This is just sad. Trolls broke the score of another great X360 exclusive.

Name and shame those people.



                            

Around the Network

8.5

I enjoyed the story but I thought it was too short. I thought the game had nice graphics too, but I thought the game was too easy.



i was really really disappointed in fable 2.

fable 1 had lot's of unique spells/combat skills that really allowed the player to experiment with various techniques. not only did fable 2 have less skills - most of them did the exact same thing just with a different visuals. the game was far too easy - i don't think i took any damage the entire second half of the game. i'm all for making a game accessible but the controls where just dumbed down too much for my taste. oh, and i was drowning in money about half way through the game. ...and don't get me started on the final boss you don't actually get to fight.

on the other hand, the game had good production values and the story wasn't bad. i know most will call this a negative, but i was happy the game was so short cause i hated most of it.

7.5



Carl2291 said:
Slimebeast said:
This is just sad. Trolls broke the score of another great X360 exclusive.

Name and shame those people.

And get flamed for it? No. They know who they are.



Slimebeast said:
Carl2291 said:
Slimebeast said:
This is just sad. Trolls broke the score of another great X360 exclusive.

Name and shame those people.

And get flamed for it? No. They know who they are.

Alright. What do you consider as a bad score? Anything lower than 8? Or anything below the average 7?

Don't call a bunch of people trolls then not have the balls to back up your statement.



                            

Carl2291 said:
Slimebeast said:
Carl2291 said:
Slimebeast said:
This is just sad. Trolls broke the score of another great X360 exclusive.

Name and shame those people.

And get flamed for it? No. They know who they are.

Alright. What do you consider as a bad score? Anything lower than 8? Or anything below the average 7?

Don't call a bunch of people trolls then not have the balls to back up your statement.

We've had this argument before, in the Halo 3 thread. You're just trying to taunt me lol.