You are implying that they did it for the consumer, and not to boost sales. Whether that was your original intention or not, you still mentioned it.  In the red section, you imply that making you need to make a profit in order to be " as bad". When that isn't necessarily true. I think all three companies are from the same place. They want to make money, and don't care about anything else really. Also going back and reading his post again, he was discussing whether or not sony cares for their consumers more or less than Microsoft, not "how bad" they are at overpricing stuff.

Actually how about I go to the root of the conversation.

* You make a post that references to Sony shafting loyal buyers. You didn't mention it, but kowenicki did.

*Kowenicki mentions how bad sony is shafting first term and loyal customers.

* You mention something about him hating sony, but not Nintendo or Microsoft.

* He mentions that he hates nobody. He just finds it funny how there is a double standard where Sony fans mention how they are treated well. Then he mentions they (may) even be just as bad as Microsoft.(This isn't the main point though, and you refering to it as such really doesn't make it so.)

* You mention the  200 loss, as if Sony meant to do it for the customers and not because they have to.

* He mentiones that they have to.

* Then the quoted post and everything else.

Am I missing anything?

FINAL FANTASY 7 REMAKE