And I just wanted to comment here so people can see that you copy and paste according to your convenience...

My supposed last reply WASN'T that. Stop manipulating. I already replied you on that and everybody CAN check my posts and realize how strangely you're acting.

"That's why I put "believe "in" evolution. Do you see that?
"We humans accept and assume things differently, sometimes. When I say that they believe in evolution I was precisely referring to what you said, although I must also say that a lot of people accept it "just because".
"Regards."

Oh wow, I can see how the full version of your reply completely changes the meaning, in that it doesn't at all.  HWS101's paraphrase describes that "confidence in evolutionary theory's correctness" is an option; your argument is that "subscribing to a faith about evolution" is not an option.   

Or is the problem that "I was precisely referring to what you said" doesn't specify WHICH one you're talking about?  Is your position that even thinking that evolutionary theory might be correct is incompatible with being Christian?   

Kasz is 100% accurate.  Christianity was very diverse before the Romans centralized the religion.

Marcionism

Marcionism rejects the entire Hebrew Bible, and declared that the God of the Hebrew Bible was a lesser demiurge, who had created the earth, but was the source of evil.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcionism

Monarchianism

Emphasize God as being one person and the only ruler of his kingdom. The term "Monarchians" or "Monarchists" was given to Christians who defended the "monarchy" of God in a reaction against the Logos theology of Justin Martyr and the apologists, who had spoken of Jesus as a "second god.

http://.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchianism

Adoptionism

Belief that Jesus was born merely human and that he became divine later in his life. By these accounts, Jesus earned the title Christ through his sinless devotion to the will of God, thereby becoming the perfect sacrifice to redeem humanity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adoptionism

I am very aware of those, but there's some diversity in all ideologies and religions (communism, socialism, capitalism, islam, hinduism, Cristianity, konfucianism etc).

First you gotta quanitfy the impact and relevance of those branches if you're gonna make an argument (they were small). And Kasz is completelt wrong in saying it wasn't until Roman influense in the 4th century that Christianity was unified. Even Paul and John in the NT itself are warning about gnosticism. The Canon was set in the 2nd century already. Etc.

They were not small, an example Marcion of Sinope (founder of Marcionism) had a large following.  They were not unified in the second century, and example being Paul of Samosata (supporter of adoptionism) whose teachings flourished in the first millenia.

Marcion was significant, but the early church fathers condemned his teachings clearly. As I said, there's always some offsprings of every ideology.

Paul of Samosata was an early church father.  He was the bishop of Antioch in the 3rd century and taught that Jesus was born a man but was adopted by God.  His theology, Paulicianism, was significantly large in the medieval period and survived until the 19th century.

Well, he was wrong.