ManusJustus said:
Kasz is 100% accurate. Christianity was very diverse before the Romans centralized the religion. Marcionism Marcionism rejects the entire Hebrew Bible, and declared that the God of the Hebrew Bible was a lesser demiurge, who had created the earth, but was the source of evil. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcionism Monarchianism Emphasize God as being one person and the only ruler of his kingdom. The term "Monarchians" or "Monarchists" was given to Christians who defended the "monarchy" of God in a reaction against the Logos theology of Justin Martyr and the apologists, who had spoken of Jesus as a "second god. http://.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchianism Adoptionism Belief that Jesus was born merely human and that he became divine later in his life. By these accounts, Jesus earned the title Christ through his sinless devotion to the will of God, thereby becoming the perfect sacrifice to redeem humanity. |
I am very aware of those, but there's some diversity in all ideologies and religions (communism, socialism, capitalism, islam, hinduism, Cristianity, konfucianism etc).
First you gotta quanitfy the impact and relevance of those branches if you're gonna make an argument (they were small). And Kasz is completelt wrong in saying it wasn't until Roman influense in the 4th century that Christianity was unified. Even Paul and John in the NT itself are warning about gnosticism. The Canon was set in the 2nd century already. Etc.







