By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - My Supreme Viewpoint on the Big Three

liquidninja said:
Kantor said:

Why? What would this achieve?

Sony and Microsoft still lose money if their products do badly. They still want to do well. The company just won't be crippled if one division fails.

I don't see how that's a bad thing.

Better games products for one.

You can't objectively say that Nintendo's first party offerings are any better than Sony's this gen.

EDIT: Metacritic is a commonly used objective measure.

Number of first/second party developed (as in, first party studio or somebody with a very close relation, like Resistance or MP)

PS3: 12

Wii: 5

So, using Metacritic, Sony's first party PS3 efforts are better than Nintendo's first party Wii efforts.



(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective

Around the Network

I think the essence of the thread is:
-Video game companies should be just video games
-Multifaceted companies that are also in the video game business are taking advantage of the 'traditional' gaming industry
-'Video game only' companies work too hard to keep themselves profitable/afloat just for some multi-billion dollar company to come in and pay everyone else to do what they're doing and just brand it their name at the end of the day

Change, that's just the nature of the business, like it or not.



How do ppl post blatantly ignorant, arrogant threads like this???...MS and SONY are Multifaced companies...BIG ****** DEAL, they have a huge piece of there companies dedicated to the gaming industry..so HERE in the gaming industry when we talking about SONY are and MS were talkin bout gaming side..and +1 to Darth my gawd



Kantor said:

You can't objectively say that Nintendo's first party offerings are any better than Sony's this gen.

EDIT: Metacritic is a commonly used objective measure.

Number of first/second party developed (as in, first party studio or somebody with a very close relation, like Resistance or MP)

PS3: 12

Wii: 5

So, using Metacritic, Sony's first party PS3 efforts are better than Nintendo's first party Wii efforts.

I wasn't saying that Nintendo made better games than them. I was saying that Microsoft and Sony would make better games products if their business relied on them received well by people and also Nintendo would make better products because they would have real competition for a change.



Metacritic isn't objective? Its a compilation of subjective opinions, you can't just collect subjective opinions of a game and call it an objective measure of a game, all it becomes is a poll of a select sample, not even a true sample of the market as game reviewers tend not to be representative of the larger market



 

Predictions:Sales of Wii Fit will surpass the combined sales of the Grand Theft Auto franchiseLifetime sales of Wii will surpass the combined sales of the entire Playstation family of consoles by 12/31/2015 Wii hardware sales will surpass the total hardware sales of the PS2 by 12/31/2010 Wii will have 50% marketshare or more by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!!  It was a little over 48% only)Wii will surpass 45 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!!  Nintendo Financials showed it fell slightly short of 45 million shipped by end of 2008)Wii will surpass 80 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2009 (I was wrong!! Wii didn't even get to 70 Million)

Around the Network
CGI-Quality said:
liquidninja said:
Kantor said:

You can't objectively say that Nintendo's first party offerings are any better than Sony's this gen.

EDIT: Metacritic is a commonly used objective measure.

Number of first/second party developed (as in, first party studio or somebody with a very close relation, like Resistance or MP)

PS3: 12

Wii: 5

So, using Metacritic, Sony's first party PS3 efforts are better than Nintendo's first party Wii efforts.

I wasn't saying that Nintendo made better games than them. I was saying that Microsoft and Sony would make better games products if their business relied on them received well by people and also Nintendo would make better products because they would have real competition for a change.

Errr......Microsoft and Sony's games are received well by people, what are you talking about?


  O'rly?  is that why only one 360 game has sold over 10 million, and no PS3 game has?



 

Predictions:Sales of Wii Fit will surpass the combined sales of the Grand Theft Auto franchiseLifetime sales of Wii will surpass the combined sales of the entire Playstation family of consoles by 12/31/2015 Wii hardware sales will surpass the total hardware sales of the PS2 by 12/31/2010 Wii will have 50% marketshare or more by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!!  It was a little over 48% only)Wii will surpass 45 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!!  Nintendo Financials showed it fell slightly short of 45 million shipped by end of 2008)Wii will surpass 80 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2009 (I was wrong!! Wii didn't even get to 70 Million)

Wow Sony has 81 companies so they could release 20-40 exclusives every year if they put 2-3 years into each exclsuive.

All this tell me is sony really needs more ads.



"Rainbird: Why don't Nintendo and Microsoft Copy the Sony Blog?

Bagenome:You can't shoot things on a blog, and babies can't read, so I don't think it would suit either one's target audience."

 

d21lewis said:
Honestly, do JRPG makers even realize how hard it is to save the world? That shit is impossible!

 

 

 

Avinash_Tyagi said:
CGI-Quality said:
liquidninja said:
Kantor said:

You can't objectively say that Nintendo's first party offerings are any better than Sony's this gen.

EDIT: Metacritic is a commonly used objective measure.

Number of first/second party developed (as in, first party studio or somebody with a very close relation, like Resistance or MP)

PS3: 12

Wii: 5

So, using Metacritic, Sony's first party PS3 efforts are better than Nintendo's first party Wii efforts.

I wasn't saying that Nintendo made better games than them. I was saying that Microsoft and Sony would make better games products if their business relied on them received well by people and also Nintendo would make better products because they would have real competition for a change.

Errr......Microsoft and Sony's games are received well by people, what are you talking about?


  O'rly?  is that why only one 360 game has sold over 10 million, and no PS3 game has?


man.......so if a game doesn't hit 10mil, its not well received??

Xxain said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:
CGI-Quality said:
liquidninja said:
Kantor said:

You can't objectively say that Nintendo's first party offerings are any better than Sony's this gen.

EDIT: Metacritic is a commonly used objective measure.

Number of first/second party developed (as in, first party studio or somebody with a very close relation, like Resistance or MP)

PS3: 12

Wii: 5

So, using Metacritic, Sony's first party PS3 efforts are better than Nintendo's first party Wii efforts.

I wasn't saying that Nintendo made better games than them. I was saying that Microsoft and Sony would make better games products if their business relied on them received well by people and also Nintendo would make better products because they would have real competition for a change.

Errr......Microsoft and Sony's games are received well by people, what are you talking about?


  O'rly?  is that why only one 360 game has sold over 10 million, and no PS3 game has?


man.......so if a game doesn't hit 10mil, its not well received??

No, my point is Wii games are extremely well recieved, moreso than the PS3 and 360 games



 

Predictions:Sales of Wii Fit will surpass the combined sales of the Grand Theft Auto franchiseLifetime sales of Wii will surpass the combined sales of the entire Playstation family of consoles by 12/31/2015 Wii hardware sales will surpass the total hardware sales of the PS2 by 12/31/2010 Wii will have 50% marketshare or more by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!!  It was a little over 48% only)Wii will surpass 45 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!!  Nintendo Financials showed it fell slightly short of 45 million shipped by end of 2008)Wii will surpass 80 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2009 (I was wrong!! Wii didn't even get to 70 Million)

CGI-Quality said:
Avinash_Tyagi said:
CGI-Quality said:
liquidninja said:
Kantor said:

You can't objectively say that Nintendo's first party offerings are any better than Sony's this gen.

EDIT: Metacritic is a commonly used objective measure.

Number of first/second party developed (as in, first party studio or somebody with a very close relation, like Resistance or MP)

PS3: 12

Wii: 5

So, using Metacritic, Sony's first party PS3 efforts are better than Nintendo's first party Wii efforts.

I wasn't saying that Nintendo made better games than them. I was saying that Microsoft and Sony would make better games products if their business relied on them received well by people and also Nintendo would make better products because they would have real competition for a change.

Errr......Microsoft and Sony's games are received well by people, what are you talking about?


  O'rly?  is that why only one 360 game has sold over 10 million, and no PS3 game has?

Oh, I see, so being received well, to you, is based on sales? MMMkay.....

consumers vote with their pocketbooks



 

Predictions:Sales of Wii Fit will surpass the combined sales of the Grand Theft Auto franchiseLifetime sales of Wii will surpass the combined sales of the entire Playstation family of consoles by 12/31/2015 Wii hardware sales will surpass the total hardware sales of the PS2 by 12/31/2010 Wii will have 50% marketshare or more by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!!  It was a little over 48% only)Wii will surpass 45 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!!  Nintendo Financials showed it fell slightly short of 45 million shipped by end of 2008)Wii will surpass 80 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2009 (I was wrong!! Wii didn't even get to 70 Million)